Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2020 KER 12246
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2020 KER 12246
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., v. SUB REGISTRAR

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

    THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.4511 OF 2020(L)

    PETITIONERS:

    1 THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED.,

    HEAD OFFICE AT ALUVA, BRANCH AT TRIPRAYAR,

    REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT OF LCRD,

    THRISSUR DIVISION, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR,

    JOHNSON M. T.

    2 THAJUDEEN M. K.

    MADATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, NATTIKA, THRISSUR.

    BY ADVS.

    SRI.A.ANTONY

    SMT.LEELAMMA ANTONY

    RESPONDENTS:

    1 SUB REGISTRAR

    SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, KATTOOR,

    THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 702.

    2 B.R.D. SECURITIES LTD.,

    KUNNAMKULAM, KUNNAMKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK,

    THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 506.

    3 SHIJU

    S/O. KAYAMPURATH DHARMAPALAN, KARALAM, VELLANI DESOM,

    KARALAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,

    THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 711.

    OTHER PRESENT:

    SMT.A.C.VIDYA, GOVT. PLEADER

    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

    27.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

    1

    JUDGMENT

    Dated this the 27th day of February 2020

    The 1stpetitioner is the Bank. 2ndpetitioner is the auction purchaser from the 1stpetitioner Bank. The sale was conducted invoking the provisions of SARFAESI Act. On account of the subsequent attachment effected over the secured asset after mortgage, the registering authority refused to register the sale certificate.

    Though notice was served on the party respondent, none appeared. In the light of the fact that sale was conducted pursuant to statutory provisions under the SARFAESI Act, the registering authority is directed to register the sale certificate in favour of the 2ndpetitioner ignoring the attachment effected over the property. The subsequent attachment also shall be effaced from the records.

    This writ petition is disposed of as above.

    Sd/-

    A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

    JUDGE

    2

    APPENDIX

    PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

    EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION OF THE SHEEBA

    YOUSAFALY AND P. K. YOUSAFALY DATED

    16.5.2008 CONFIRMING THE DEPOSIT OF TITLE

    DEED OF THE PROPERTY AS EQUITABLE MORTGAGE

    AS ENVISAGED UNDER SECTION 58(f) OF THE

    TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT.

    EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF SALE CERTIFICATE DATED

    25.8.2017 EXECUTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER IN

    FAVOUR OF THE 2ND PETITIONER.

    EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED

    3.8.2019 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER ADDRESSED TO

    THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

    EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED

    BY KATTOOR SRO DATED 21.5.2014.

    RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. True Copy

    P.S to Judge

    3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., v. SUB REGISTRAR
    (Feb 27, 2020)