Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
  • Sections 8(C), 20(B), 25, 29 of the NDPS Act.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
  • Sections 8(C), 20(B), 25, 29 of the NDPS Act.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    RAJUBHAI NAVNITBHAI BAROT v. STATE OF GUJARAT

    R/CR.MA/24052/2022 ORDER DATED: 03/01/2023

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 24052 of 2022

    ==========================================================

    RAJUBHAI NAVNITBHAI BAROT

    Versus

    STATE OF GUJARAT

    ========================================================== Appearance:

    MR NASIR SAIYED(6145) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR L. B. DABHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMIR J. DAVE

    Date : 03/01/2023

    ORAL ORDER

    1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

    2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No.11197034220620 of 2022 with Padra Police Station, District Vadodara, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C), 20(B), 25, 29 of the NDPS Act.

    3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that alleged seized contraband substance i.e.

    Page 1 of 5

    Ganja is intermediate quantity as per NDPS Act i.e. 1 kg 940 grms. He also submits that it is not the case of the prosecution that accused was purchasing, selling or distributing the narcotic drugs to hurt the youngsters and he therefore submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

    4. The learned APP opposes the grant of bail looking to the nature and gravity of offences.

    5. Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

    6. I have heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the papers of investigation.

    7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made in the FIR and without discussing the evidence in

    Page 2 of 5

    details as well as without going into details, prima-facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.11197034220620 of 2022 with Padra Police Station, District Vadodara, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that;

    [a] he shall not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

    [b] he shall not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

    [c] he shall surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

    Page 3 of 5

    [d] he shall not leave the India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

    [e] he shall furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;

    8. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall not

    Page 4 of 5

    be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

    9. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

    (SAMIR J. DAVE,J)

    MEHUL B. TUVAR

    Page 5 of 5

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    RAJUBHAI NAVNITBHAI BAROT v. STATE OF GUJARAT
    (Jan 3, 2023)