Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

    Kopasan v. Shamu And Three Ors.

    and Brandt, J.

    1. The alleged document, if it were in existence and produced, could not be received in evidence except on payment of a penalty, but it cannot be produced, and there is no provision for levying a penalty. Secondary evidence of the contents of the document cannot, therefore, be admitted--Marine Investment Company v. Hariside L.R. 5 H.L. 624.

    2. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Kopasan v. Shamu And Three Ors.
    (Apr 25, 1884)