Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

    Queen-Empress v. Ganga Ram And Another

    Brodhurst, J.:— One of the grounds for revision is, that sanction under s. 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code should not have been given until the complainants had been afforded an opportunity of proving their case, which had been thrown out merely on the report of the police.

    This objection is, I think, valid, and it is supported by the judgment of Garth, O.J, and Field, J., in The Government v. Karimdad. Under the circumstances above referred to, I set aside the Magistrate's order of the 25th July, 1885.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Queen-Empress v. Ganga Ram And Another
    (Dec 2, 1885)