Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Raja Khan And Another v. Emperor Opposite Party.

    Sanderson, C.J:— This is an appeal by Raja Khan and Cherak Ali Akon. The gist of the case was that one Torap Ali was guilty of cheating by personating one Sabdar Faraji and using his name on a surety bond. The charge against Torap Ali was that he was the principal in the case and the charge against Raja Khan and Cherak Ali Akon, the two appellants, was that they abetted by being present at the personation which is alleged to have been committed by Torap Ali. Torap Ali has been acquitted by the jury and therefore it must be taken that the case against him could not be substantiated.

    2. The learned Judge did not tell the jury that the first thing that must be decided was, whether the alleged offence had been committed by Torap Ali, and he omitted to tell them that unless they found that Torap Ali was guilty of the offence Raja Khan and Cherak Ali Akon could not be found guilty of abetting that offence. Having regard to the omission to which I have referred in the Judge's summing up, I think the conviction of these two men must be set aside. Consequently, this appeal must be allowed and the conviction of, and the sentence passed on, those two appellants must be set aside. If either of them is in jail he must be released; if on bail, his bond must be discharged.

    Mookerjee, J.:— I agree.

    V.B/R.K

    3. Appeal allowed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Raja Khan And Another v. Emperor Opposite Party.
    (Nov 26, 1920)