Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Limitations on PCRA's Newly-Recognized Constitutional Right Exception in State Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Spotz

Limitations on PCRA's Newly-Recognized Constitutional Right Exception in State Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Spotz

Date: Oct 19, 2017
Limitations on PCRA's Newly-Recognized Constitutional Right Exception in State Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Spotz Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mark Newton Spotz, decided by...
Commonwealth v. Jacoby: Establishing Reliability and Admissibility Standards for Y-STR DNA Evidence in Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Jacoby: Establishing Reliability and Admissibility Standards for Y-STR DNA Evidence in Pennsylvania

Date: Sep 29, 2017
Commonwealth v. Jacoby: Establishing Reliability and Admissibility Standards for Y-STR DNA Evidence in Pennsylvania Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Timothy Matthew Jacoby is a landmark...
Clarifying Bad Faith Insurance Claims: Two-Pronged Test without Motive Requirement Under 42 Pa.C.S. §8371

Clarifying Bad Faith Insurance Claims: Two-Pronged Test without Motive Requirement Under 42 Pa.C.S. §8371

Date: Sep 29, 2017
Clarifying Bad Faith Insurance Claims: Two-Pronged Test without Motive Requirement Under 42 Pa.C.S. §8371 Introduction The case of Matthew Rancosky, Administrator DBN of the Estate of Leann Rancosky...
Suppressing Evidence as Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: Insights from Commonwealth v. Shabezz

Suppressing Evidence as Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: Insights from Commonwealth v. Shabezz

Date: Jul 20, 2017
Suppressing Evidence as Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: Insights from Commonwealth v. Shabezz Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Saleem Shabezz, 166 A.3d 278 (Pa. 2017), is a landmark decision...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules SORNA's Retroactive Registration Unconstitutional under Ex Post Facto Clauses

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules SORNA's Retroactive Registration Unconstitutional under Ex Post Facto Clauses

Date: Jul 20, 2017
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules SORNA's Retroactive Registration Unconstitutional under Ex Post Facto Clauses Introduction In the landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jose M. Muniz, the...
Exclusive Jurisdiction of Section 7766 Over Section 7740.1 in Trustee Removal

Exclusive Jurisdiction of Section 7766 Over Section 7740.1 in Trustee Removal

Date: Jul 20, 2017
Exclusive Jurisdiction of Section 7766 Over Section 7740.1 in Trustee Removal Introduction In the case of Trust Under Agreement of Edward Winslow Taylor Appeal of: Wells Fargo Bank, the Supreme Court...
Presumption Against Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders: Commonwealth v. Batts

Presumption Against Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders: Commonwealth v. Batts

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Presumption Against Life Without Parole for Juvenile Offenders: Commonwealth v. Batts Introduction Case: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Qu'eed Batts, Appellant Court: Supreme Court of...
Environmental Trust and Public Resource Management: Insights from PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Environmental Trust and Public Resource Management: Insights from PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date: Jun 21, 2017
Environmental Trust and Public Resource Management: Insights from PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Introduction The case of PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL...
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Act 111: Limits on Home Rule Charters in Collective Bargaining

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Act 111: Limits on Home Rule Charters in Collective Bargaining

Date: May 23, 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Act 111: Limits on Home Rule Charters in Collective Bargaining Introduction The landmark case City of Pittsburgh, Appellee v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort...
Reaffirmation of Supreme Court's Exclusive Authority in Attorney Regulation

Reaffirmation of Supreme Court's Exclusive Authority in Attorney Regulation

Date: Apr 27, 2017
Reaffirmation of Supreme Court's Exclusive Authority in Attorney Regulation: Jean Louise Villani v. John Seibert, Jr. and Mary Seibert Introduction The case of Jean Louise Villani, Individually and...
Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole: Clarifying Parole Credit Discretion and Accountability Requirements

Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole: Clarifying Parole Credit Discretion and Accountability Requirements

Date: Apr 27, 2017
Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole: Clarifying Parole Credit Discretion and Accountability Requirements Introduction Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is a...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Raghunandan Yandamuri Case: Implications on Miranda Rights and Suppression Motions

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Raghunandan Yandamuri Case: Implications on Miranda Rights and Suppression Motions

Date: Apr 27, 2017
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Raghunandan Yandamuri Case: Implications on Miranda Rights and Suppression Motions Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Raghunandan...
Mandated Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: New Precedent Established by In Re: Adoption of L.B.M.

Mandated Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: New Precedent Established by In Re: Adoption of L.B.M.

Date: Mar 29, 2017
Mandated Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: New Precedent Established by In Re: Adoption of L.B.M. Introduction The case of In Re: Adoption of L.B.M., a Minor (161 A.3d 172)...
Maintaining the Public Record Presumption: Insights from Justice Baer's Dissent in Commonwealth v. Burton

Maintaining the Public Record Presumption: Insights from Justice Baer's Dissent in Commonwealth v. Burton

Date: Mar 29, 2017
Maintaining the Public Record Presumption: Insights from Justice Baer's Dissent in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Burton Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Shawn Lamar Burton,...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Handling Conflicting Ballistics and Eyewitness Identification – Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bernard Cousar

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Handling Conflicting Ballistics and Eyewitness Identification – Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bernard Cousar

Date: Feb 23, 2017
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Handling Conflicting Ballistics and Eyewitness Identification – Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bernard Cousar Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v....
Affirmation of Denial of Post Conviction Relief: Upholding Ineffective Assistance Claims Under Strickland Standards

Affirmation of Denial of Post Conviction Relief: Upholding Ineffective Assistance Claims Under Strickland Standards

Date: Nov 23, 2016
Affirmation of Denial of Post Conviction Relief: Upholding Ineffective Assistance Claims Under Strickland Standards Introduction In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Hannibal, 753 A.2d 197 (Pa. 2016),...
Severability and the Uniformity Clause: Insights from Mount Airy #1, LLC v. PA Dept. of Revenue

Severability and the Uniformity Clause: Insights from Mount Airy #1, LLC v. PA Dept. of Revenue

Date: Sep 29, 2016
Severability and the Uniformity Clause: Insights from Mount Airy #1, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue Introduction The case of Mount Airy #1, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue and...
Strict Timeliness Standards for Post-Conviction Relief: Cox v. Commonwealth Sets Robust Due Diligence Requirements

Strict Timeliness Standards for Post-Conviction Relief: Cox v. Commonwealth Sets Robust Due Diligence Requirements

Date: Sep 29, 2016
Strict Timeliness Standards for Post-Conviction Relief: Cox v. Commonwealth Sets Robust Due Diligence Requirements Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jermont Cox (146 A.3d 221)...
Double Jeopardy Protections Affirmed in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ball

Double Jeopardy Protections Affirmed in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ball

Date: Sep 29, 2016
Affirmation of Double Jeopardy Protections in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James Arthur Ball III Introduction In the landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James Arthur Ball III (146...
Alleyne v. Washington: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Non-Retroactivity of Mandatory Minimums

Alleyne v. Washington: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Non-Retroactivity of Mandatory Minimums

Date: Jul 20, 2016
Alleyne v. Washington: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Non-Retroactivity of Mandatory Minimums Introduction The case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Terrance Washington, decided by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert