Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Dismissal of Ballot Initiative Appeal: Implications of Mootness Doctrine in Ballot Advocacy

Dismissal of Ballot Initiative Appeal: Implications of Mootness Doctrine in Ballot Advocacy

Date: Dec 31, 2010
Dismissal of Ballot Initiative Appeal: Implications of Mootness Doctrine in Ballot Advocacy Introduction In the landmark case of Personhood Nevada, et al. v. Emmily Bristol, et al., the Supreme Court...
Establishing the "Last Event Necessary" Principle in Choice of Law for Slow-Developing Disease Tort Actions

Establishing the "Last Event Necessary" Principle in Choice of Law for Slow-Developing Disease Tort Actions

Date: Nov 25, 2010
Establishing the "Last Event Necessary" Principle in Choice of Law for Slow-Developing Disease Tort Actions Introduction The legal landscape continually evolves as courts address complex issues...
Supreme Court of Nevada Upholds NRS 201.220: Clarifying Vagueness and Overbreadth in Indecent Exposure Laws

Supreme Court of Nevada Upholds NRS 201.220: Clarifying Vagueness and Overbreadth in Indecent Exposure Laws

Date: Nov 25, 2010
Supreme Court of Nevada Upholds NRS 201.220: Clarifying Vagueness and Overbreadth in Indecent Exposure Laws Introduction In the case of The State of Nevada v. Marty Edward Castaneda (245 P.3d 550),...
Necessity Defense in DUI Charges: Insights from Hoagland v. State of Nevada

Necessity Defense in DUI Charges: Insights from Hoagland v. State of Nevada

Date: Oct 8, 2010
Necessity Defense in DUI Charges: Insights from Hoagland v. State of Nevada Introduction The case of Richard William Hoagland v. The State of Nevada, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on...
Confrontation Clause in Testimonial Evidence: Insights from Bernardo Prado Vega v. The State of Nevada

Confrontation Clause in Testimonial Evidence: Insights from Bernardo Prado Vega v. The State of Nevada

Date: Aug 13, 2010
Confrontation Clause in Testimonial Evidence: Insights from Bernardo Prado Vega v. The State of Nevada Introduction The case of Bernardo Prado Vega v. The State of Nevada (236 P.3d 632) adjudicated...
Expanded Standing for Emotional Distress Claims in Negligent Handling of Deceased Remains: Nevada Supreme Court's Boorman Decision

Expanded Standing for Emotional Distress Claims in Negligent Handling of Deceased Remains: Nevada Supreme Court's Boorman Decision

Date: Jul 30, 2010
Expanded Standing for Emotional Distress Claims in Negligent Handling of Deceased Remains: Nevada Supreme Court's Boorman Decision Introduction The case of Boorman et al. v. Nevada Memorial Cremation...
Affirmation of Non-Case Concluding Sanctions Under NRCP 37: Bahena v. Goodyear

Affirmation of Non-Case Concluding Sanctions Under NRCP 37: Bahena v. Goodyear

Date: Jul 2, 2010
Affirmation of Non-Case Concluding Sanctions Under NRCP 37: Bahena v. Goodyear Introduction Bahena v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, 235 P.3d 592 (Nev. 2010), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Sanctions for Discovery Abuses and Burden of Proof After Default: Foster v. Dingwall

Sanctions for Discovery Abuses and Burden of Proof After Default: Foster v. Dingwall

Date: Feb 26, 2010
Sanctions for Discovery Abuses and Burden of Proof After Default: Foster v. Dingwall Introduction Foster v. Dingwall, 227 P.3d 1042 (Nev. 2010), addresses critical issues surrounding the imposition...
Higgs v. Nevada: Upholding NRS 50.275 Standard for Expert Testimony Admissibility

Higgs v. Nevada: Upholding NRS 50.275 Standard for Expert Testimony Admissibility

Date: Jan 15, 2010
Higgs v. Nevada: Upholding NRS 50.275 Standard for Expert Testimony Admissibility Introduction Higgs v. Nevada is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on January 14, 2010. The...
Supreme Court of Nevada Affirms No Duty of Pharmacies to Third Parties in Prescription Drug-Related Injuries

Supreme Court of Nevada Affirms No Duty of Pharmacies to Third Parties in Prescription Drug-Related Injuries

Date: Dec 25, 2009
Supreme Court of Nevada Affirms No Duty of Pharmacies to Third Parties in Prescription Drug-Related Injuries Introduction In the landmark case of SANCHEZ AND MARTINEZ v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al.,...
Affirmation of Dual Prosecution and Indictment Election under NRS 178.562(1): Thompson v. State of Nevada

Affirmation of Dual Prosecution and Indictment Election under NRS 178.562(1): Thompson v. State of Nevada

Date: Dec 11, 2009
Affirmation of Dual Prosecution and Indictment Election under NRS 178.562(1): Thompson v. State of Nevada Introduction In the case of Luqris Thompson v. The State of Nevada, decided on December 10,...
Ensuring Due Process in International Child Custody Cases: Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Improper Default Divorce Decree

Ensuring Due Process in International Child Custody Cases: Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Improper Default Divorce Decree

Date: Nov 13, 2009
Ensuring Due Process in International Child Custody Cases: Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Improper Default Divorce Decree Introduction The case of Shinichi Ogawa v. Yoko Ogawa (221 P.3d 699),...
Compliance and Separation of Powers in Nevada's Deadly Weapon Enhancement Statute: Mendoza-Lobos Case Analysis

Compliance and Separation of Powers in Nevada's Deadly Weapon Enhancement Statute: Mendoza-Lobos Case Analysis

Date: Oct 30, 2009
Compliance and Separation of Powers in Nevada's Deadly Weapon Enhancement Statute: Mendoza-Lobos Case Analysis Introduction The case of Douglas Mendoza-Lobos v. The State of Nevada addresses...
Limits on Issue Preclusion for Non-Parties: Harrah's Laughlin Hotel and Casino Decision

Limits on Issue Preclusion for Non-Parties: Harrah's Laughlin Hotel and Casino Decision

Date: Sep 11, 2009
Limits on Issue Preclusion for Non-Parties: Harrah's Laughlin Hotel and Casino Decision Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada's decision in Michael Bower et al. v. Harrah's Laughlin, Inc. (215...
Defining Joint Physical Custody: Insights from Rivero v. Rivero

Defining Joint Physical Custody: Insights from Rivero v. Rivero

Date: Aug 28, 2009
Defining Joint Physical Custody: Insights from Rivero v. Rivero Introduction The case of Michelle Rivero v. Elvis Rivero, decided by the Supreme Court of Nevada on August 27, 2009, presents a pivotal...
Clark County School District v. Virtual Education Software, Inc.: Expanding Absolute Privilege and Clarifying Defamation Per Se vs. Business Disparagement

Clark County School District v. Virtual Education Software, Inc.: Expanding Absolute Privilege and Clarifying Defamation Per Se vs. Business Disparagement

Date: Aug 7, 2009
Clark County School District v. Virtual Education Software, Inc.: Expanding Absolute Privilege and Clarifying Defamation Per Se vs. Business Disparagement Introduction In the landmark case of Clark...
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Insurance Bad Faith Actions: Allstate v. Miller

Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Insurance Bad Faith Actions: Allstate v. Miller

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Insurance Bad Faith Actions: Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller Introduction The case of Allstate Insurance Company v. William Miller (212 P.3d 318,...
Preliminary Hearings and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause: Comprehensive Analysis of Chavez v. State of Nevada

Preliminary Hearings and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause: Comprehensive Analysis of Chavez v. State of Nevada

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Preliminary Hearings and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause: Comprehensive Analysis of Chavez v. State of Nevada Introduction In the landmark case of James Chavez, Appellant, vs. The State of...
Affirming Scope of Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus in McConnell v. Nevada: Implications for Execution Protocol Challenges

Affirming Scope of Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus in McConnell v. Nevada: Implications for Execution Protocol Challenges

Date: Jul 24, 2009
Affirming Scope of Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus in McConnell v. Nevada: Implications for Execution Protocol Challenges Introduction McConnell v. The State of Nevada, 212 P.3d 307 (Nev. 2009),...
Application of Nevada's Economic Loss Doctrine to Professional Negligence in Commercial Property Development

Application of Nevada's Economic Loss Doctrine to Professional Negligence in Commercial Property Development

Date: Mar 27, 2009
Application of Nevada's Economic Loss Doctrine to Professional Negligence in Commercial Property Development Introduction The case of Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. et al. v. Mandalay Resort...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert