Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Green v. United States: Dismissal of §1983 Claims for Constitutional Violations

Green v. United States: Dismissal of §1983 Claims for Constitutional Violations

Date: Aug 1, 2010
Green v. United States: Dismissal of §1983 Claims for Constitutional Violations Introduction In the case of Green v. United States of America, Civil Action No. 10-568, the plaintiff, Tyrone Green, a...
Reaffirming the Doctrine of Chances: Admissibility of Multiple Property Fires under MRE 404(b)(1) in Arson Cases – People v. Mardlin

Reaffirming the Doctrine of Chances: Admissibility of Multiple Property Fires under MRE 404(b)(1) in Arson Cases – People v. Mardlin

Date: Aug 1, 2010
Reaffirming the Doctrine of Chances: Admissibility of Multiple Property Fires under MRE 404(b)(1) in Arson Cases – People v. Mardlin Introduction People v. Mardlin (487 Mich. 609, 2010) is a pivotal...
Jurisdictional Limits in Humanitarian Asylum: Insights from Jahjaga v. United States Attorney General

Jurisdictional Limits in Humanitarian Asylum: Insights from Jahjaga v. United States Attorney General

Date: Aug 1, 2010
Jurisdictional Limits in Humanitarian Asylum: Insights from Jahjaga v. United States Attorney General Introduction Avni Jahjaga, a native of Serbian Montenegro and citizen of Kosovo, sought asylum in...
Actual Malice in Defamation of Public Officials: Comprehensive Commentary on Smith v. Anonymous Joint Enterprise

Actual Malice in Defamation of Public Officials: Comprehensive Commentary on Smith v. Anonymous Joint Enterprise

Date: Jul 31, 2010
Actual Malice in Defamation of Public Officials: Comprehensive Commentary on Smith v. Anonymous Joint Enterprise Introduction Smith v. Anonymous Joint Enterprise, 487 Mich. 102, decided by the...
Affirmation of Convictions in Bateman v. State: Implications for Witness Intimidation and Sentencing

Affirmation of Convictions in Bateman v. State: Implications for Witness Intimidation and Sentencing

Date: Jul 30, 2010
Affirmation of Convictions in Bateman v. State: Implications for Witness Intimidation and Sentencing Introduction State of Washington v. Dustin Scott Bateman is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Self-Defense Affirmative Defense in Felon-In-Possession Charges: Interpretation in People v. Dupree

Self-Defense Affirmative Defense in Felon-In-Possession Charges: Interpretation in People v. Dupree

Date: Jul 24, 2010
Self-Defense Affirmative Defense in Felon-In-Possession Charges: Interpretation in People v. Dupree Introduction People v. Dupree, 286 Mich 916 (2010), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Affirmation of Strict Adherence to MRE 702 Standards for Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice: Edry v. Adelman

Affirmation of Strict Adherence to MRE 702 Standards for Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice: Edry v. Adelman

Date: Jul 23, 2010
Affirmation of Strict Adherence to MRE 702 Standards for Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice: Edry v. Adelman Introduction The case of Tracy Edry v. Marc Adelman and Marc Adelman, D.O., P.C. (486...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Strict Standards for Admitting Child Testimonies in Sexual Abuse Cases

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Strict Standards for Admitting Child Testimonies in Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Jul 23, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Strict Standards for Admitting Child Testimonies in Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Jason Michael Gursky...
Ripeness and Exclusionary Zoning: Michigan Supreme Court Reiterates Finality Requirements

Ripeness and Exclusionary Zoning: Michigan Supreme Court Reiterates Finality Requirements

Date: Jul 16, 2010
Ripeness and Exclusionary Zoning: Michigan Supreme Court Reiterates Finality Requirements Introduction In the case of Jeffrey Hendee et al. v. Putnam Township (486 Mich. 556, 2010), the Michigan...
People v. Feezel: Expanding Causation and Revising Controlled Substance Definitions under Michigan Law

People v. Feezel: Expanding Causation and Revising Controlled Substance Definitions under Michigan Law

Date: Jun 9, 2010
People v. Feezel: Expanding Causation and Revising Controlled Substance Definitions under Michigan Law Introduction People v. Feezel (486 Mich. 184), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June...
Incarceration Alone Insufficient for Termination of Parental Rights: A Detailed Analysis of In re Mason

Incarceration Alone Insufficient for Termination of Parental Rights: A Detailed Analysis of In re Mason

Date: May 27, 2010
Incarceration Alone Insufficient for Termination of Parental Rights: A Detailed Analysis of In re Mason Introduction The case of In re Mason (486 Mich. 142) orchestrated a significant shift in...
PIERRON v. PIERRON: Defining the Modification of Established Custodial Environments in Child Custody Cases

PIERRON v. PIERRON: Defining the Modification of Established Custodial Environments in Child Custody Cases

Date: May 12, 2010
PIERRON v. PIERRON: Defining the Modification of Established Custodial Environments in Child Custody Cases Introduction PIERRON v. PIERRON is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Voluntary Dismissal by Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot: People v. Richmond Analysis

Voluntary Dismissal by Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot: People v. Richmond Analysis

Date: May 1, 2010
Voluntary Dismissal by Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot: People v. Richmond Analysis Introduction People v. Richmond (486 Mich. 29), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 30, 2010,...
Affirmation of Life Sentence under Michigan Habitual Offender Law in People v. Ericksen

Affirmation of Life Sentence under Michigan Habitual Offender Law in People v. Ericksen

Date: Apr 16, 2010
Affirmation of Life Sentence under Michigan Habitual Offender Law in People v. Ericksen Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Chad James Ericksen, 288 Mich. App. 192 (2010), presents a...
Two-Inch Rule Limited to County Highways: Robinson v. City of Lansing Commentary

Two-Inch Rule Limited to County Highways: Robinson v. City of Lansing Commentary

Date: Apr 9, 2010
Two-Inch Rule Limited to County Highways: Robinson v. City of Lansing Introduction Robinson v. City of Lansing, 486 Mich. 1, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 8, 2010, addresses a...
Defining Aiding and Abetting in Drug Delivery Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Plunkett

Defining Aiding and Abetting in Drug Delivery Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Plunkett

Date: Mar 31, 2010
Defining Aiding and Abetting in Drug Delivery Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Plunkett Introduction People v. Plunkett, 485 Mich. 50 (2010), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying the Proprietary Function Exception in Governmental Immunity: Dextrom v. Wexford County

Clarifying the Proprietary Function Exception in Governmental Immunity: Dextrom v. Wexford County

Date: Mar 10, 2010
Clarifying the Proprietary Function Exception in Governmental Immunity: Dextrom v. Wexford County Introduction Dextrom v. Wexford County is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Michigan Court of Appeals...
In Camera Interviews in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: A New Precedent

In Camera Interviews in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: A New Precedent

Date: Dec 16, 2009
In Camera Interviews in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: A New Precedent Introduction The case of Department of Human Services v. Rosie Lee Compton and Ronnie Compton, Sr. (286 Mich. App....
POTTER v. McLEARY: Clarifying NOI Requirements in Medical Malpractice Actions

POTTER v. McLEARY: Clarifying NOI Requirements in Medical Malpractice Actions

Date: Aug 1, 2009
POTTER v. McLEARY: Clarifying NOI Requirements in Medical Malpractice Actions Introduction In POTTER v. McLEARY (484 Mich. 397, 2009), the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed critical issues...
Timely Notices Toll Statute of Limitations: BUSH v. SHABAHANG Establishes Key Precedent

Timely Notices Toll Statute of Limitations: BUSH v. SHABAHANG Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Jul 30, 2009
Timely Notices Toll Statute of Limitations: BUSH v. SHABAHANG Establishes Key Precedent Introduction BUSH v. SHABAHANG is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, rendered on July 29,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert