Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Ripeness and Exclusionary Zoning: Michigan Supreme Court Reiterates Finality Requirements

Ripeness and Exclusionary Zoning: Michigan Supreme Court Reiterates Finality Requirements

Date: Jul 16, 2010
Ripeness and Exclusionary Zoning: Michigan Supreme Court Reiterates Finality Requirements Introduction In the case of Jeffrey Hendee et al. v. Putnam Township (486 Mich. 556, 2010), the Michigan...
People v. Feezel: Expanding Causation and Revising Controlled Substance Definitions under Michigan Law

People v. Feezel: Expanding Causation and Revising Controlled Substance Definitions under Michigan Law

Date: Jun 9, 2010
People v. Feezel: Expanding Causation and Revising Controlled Substance Definitions under Michigan Law Introduction People v. Feezel (486 Mich. 184), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on June...
Incarceration Alone Insufficient for Termination of Parental Rights: A Detailed Analysis of In re Mason

Incarceration Alone Insufficient for Termination of Parental Rights: A Detailed Analysis of In re Mason

Date: May 27, 2010
Incarceration Alone Insufficient for Termination of Parental Rights: A Detailed Analysis of In re Mason Introduction The case of In re Mason (486 Mich. 142) orchestrated a significant shift in...
PIERRON v. PIERRON: Defining the Modification of Established Custodial Environments in Child Custody Cases

PIERRON v. PIERRON: Defining the Modification of Established Custodial Environments in Child Custody Cases

Date: May 12, 2010
PIERRON v. PIERRON: Defining the Modification of Established Custodial Environments in Child Custody Cases Introduction PIERRON v. PIERRON is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Voluntary Dismissal by Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot: People v. Richmond Analysis

Voluntary Dismissal by Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot: People v. Richmond Analysis

Date: May 1, 2010
Voluntary Dismissal by Prosecution Renders Appeal Moot: People v. Richmond Analysis Introduction People v. Richmond (486 Mich. 29), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 30, 2010,...
Affirmation of Life Sentence under Michigan Habitual Offender Law in People v. Ericksen

Affirmation of Life Sentence under Michigan Habitual Offender Law in People v. Ericksen

Date: Apr 16, 2010
Affirmation of Life Sentence under Michigan Habitual Offender Law in People v. Ericksen Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Chad James Ericksen, 288 Mich. App. 192 (2010), presents a...
Two-Inch Rule Limited to County Highways: Robinson v. City of Lansing Commentary

Two-Inch Rule Limited to County Highways: Robinson v. City of Lansing Commentary

Date: Apr 9, 2010
Two-Inch Rule Limited to County Highways: Robinson v. City of Lansing Introduction Robinson v. City of Lansing, 486 Mich. 1, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 8, 2010, addresses a...
Defining Aiding and Abetting in Drug Delivery Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Plunkett

Defining Aiding and Abetting in Drug Delivery Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Plunkett

Date: Mar 31, 2010
Defining Aiding and Abetting in Drug Delivery Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Plunkett Introduction People v. Plunkett, 485 Mich. 50 (2010), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying the Proprietary Function Exception in Governmental Immunity: Dextrom v. Wexford County

Clarifying the Proprietary Function Exception in Governmental Immunity: Dextrom v. Wexford County

Date: Mar 10, 2010
Clarifying the Proprietary Function Exception in Governmental Immunity: Dextrom v. Wexford County Introduction Dextrom v. Wexford County is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Michigan Court of Appeals...
In Camera Interviews in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: A New Precedent

In Camera Interviews in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: A New Precedent

Date: Dec 16, 2009
In Camera Interviews in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: A New Precedent Introduction The case of Department of Human Services v. Rosie Lee Compton and Ronnie Compton, Sr. (286 Mich. App....
POTTER v. McLEARY: Clarifying NOI Requirements in Medical Malpractice Actions

POTTER v. McLEARY: Clarifying NOI Requirements in Medical Malpractice Actions

Date: Aug 1, 2009
POTTER v. McLEARY: Clarifying NOI Requirements in Medical Malpractice Actions Introduction In POTTER v. McLEARY (484 Mich. 397, 2009), the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed critical issues...
Timely Notices Toll Statute of Limitations: BUSH v. SHABAHANG Establishes Key Precedent

Timely Notices Toll Statute of Limitations: BUSH v. SHABAHANG Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Jul 30, 2009
Timely Notices Toll Statute of Limitations: BUSH v. SHABAHANG Establishes Key Precedent Introduction BUSH v. SHABAHANG is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, rendered on July 29,...
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Confrontation Clause and Hearsay DNA Evidence in People v. Payne

Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Confrontation Clause and Hearsay DNA Evidence in People v. Payne

Date: Jul 29, 2009
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Confrontation Clause and Hearsay DNA Evidence in People of the State of Michigan v. Scott Gordon Payne Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Scott...
Offense-Specific Scoring in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of PEOPLE v. McGRAW

Offense-Specific Scoring in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of PEOPLE v. McGRAW

Date: Jul 29, 2009
Offense-Specific Scoring in Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of PEOPLE v. McGRAW Introduction PEOPLE v. McGRAW (484 Mich. 120), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 28, 2009, addresses a...
Enhanced Local Authority to Regulate Workplace Smoking: Upholding Public Health and Employment Law Exceptions

Enhanced Local Authority to Regulate Workplace Smoking: Upholding Public Health and Employment Law Exceptions

Date: Jul 22, 2009
Enhanced Local Authority to Regulate Workplace Smoking: Upholding Public Health and Employment Law Exceptions Introduction In the landmark case of McNEIL v Charlevoix County (484 Mich. 69), the...
Supreme Court of Michigan Overrules Dunbar: No Pre-Sentence Ability-to-Pay Requirement for Attorney Fees

Supreme Court of Michigan Overrules Dunbar: No Pre-Sentence Ability-to-Pay Requirement for Attorney Fees

Date: Jul 11, 2009
Supreme Court of Michigan Overrules Dunbar: No Pre-Sentence Ability-to-Pay Requirement for Attorney Fees Introduction People v. Jackson, 769 N.W.2d 630, decided on July 10, 2009, by the Supreme Court...
Protecting Noncustodial Parents' Due Process Rights in Termination Proceedings: Analysis of In re Rood

Protecting Noncustodial Parents' Due Process Rights in Termination Proceedings: Analysis of In re Rood

Date: Apr 3, 2009
Protecting Noncustodial Parents' Due Process Rights in Termination Proceedings: Analysis of In re Rood Introduction The case of In re Rood, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 2, 2009,...
Actual Prejudice Requirement in Juror Misconduct: Insights from PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. MICHAEL ALLEN MILLER

Actual Prejudice Requirement in Juror Misconduct: Insights from PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. MICHAEL ALLEN MILLER

Date: Dec 31, 2008
Actual Prejudice Requirement in Juror Misconduct: Insights from PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. MICHAEL ALLEN MILLER Introduction PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v. MICHAEL ALLEN MILLER, 759...
Clarification of Governmental Employee Immunity for Intentional Torts: Application of the Ross Test

Clarification of Governmental Employee Immunity for Intentional Torts: Application of the Ross Test

Date: Dec 31, 2008
Clarification of Governmental Employee Immunity for Intentional Torts: Application of the Ross Test Introduction The case of Amanda Jean Odom v. Wayne County and City of Detroit, et al. adjudicated...
Michigan Court of Appeals Establishes Clear Standards for Termination of Parental Rights

Michigan Court of Appeals Establishes Clear Standards for Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Sep 24, 2008
Michigan Court of Appeals Establishes Clear Standards for Termination of Parental Rights Introduction The case of In the Matter of Alicia Danielle Utrera, Minor represents a pivotal decision by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert