Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Discrepancy Between Oral and Written Sentences Cognizable Under Rule 3.800(a): An Analysis of WILLIAMS v. STATE

Discrepancy Between Oral and Written Sentences Cognizable Under Rule 3.800(a): An Analysis of WILLIAMS v. STATE

Date: May 18, 2007
Discrepancy Between Oral and Written Sentences Cognizable Under Rule 3.800(a): An Analysis of WILLIAMS v. STATE Introduction WILLIAMS v. STATE, 957 So.2d 600 (Fla. 2007), is a landmark decision by...
Expansion of Florida's Litigation Privilege to All Causes of Action: Analysis of Echevarria v. Cole

Expansion of Florida's Litigation Privilege to All Causes of Action: Analysis of Echevarria v. Cole

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Expansion of Florida's Litigation Privilege to All Causes of Action: Analysis of Echevarria v. Cole Introduction Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett Frappier, et al. v. Bradley Cole, et al., 950 So....
Supreme Court of Florida Clarifies ALJ Jurisdiction Over Notice Requirements in NICA Claims

Supreme Court of Florida Clarifies ALJ Jurisdiction Over Notice Requirements in NICA Claims

Date: Jan 12, 2007
Supreme Court of Florida Clarifies ALJ Jurisdiction Over Notice Requirements in NICA Claims Introduction The Supreme Court of Florida addressed a pivotal issue concerning the jurisdiction of...
Ensuring Proper Weighing of Mitigating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Coday v. State of Florida

Ensuring Proper Weighing of Mitigating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Coday v. State of Florida

Date: Jan 9, 2007
Ensuring Proper Weighing of Mitigating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Coday v. State of Florida Introduction In the landmark case of William Coday, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee (946...
SANDERS v. STATE: Redefining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Lesser-Included Offense Claims

SANDERS v. STATE: Redefining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Lesser-Included Offense Claims

Date: Jan 6, 2007
SANDERS v. STATE: Redefining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Lesser-Included Offense Claims Introduction SANDERS v. STATE and WILLIS v. STATE are pivotal cases adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Limits on Class Action Certification for FDUTPA Claims: Analysis of Rollins, Inc. v. Butland

Limits on Class Action Certification for FDUTPA Claims: Analysis of Rollins, Inc. v. Butland

Date: Jan 3, 2007
Limits on Class Action Certification for FDUTPA Claims: Analysis of Rollins, Inc. v. Butland Introduction In Rollins, Inc., and Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Mark Butland et al., the District...
Affirmation of Surety Obligee as "Insured" Under Florida Statutes: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.

Affirmation of Surety Obligee as "Insured" Under Florida Statutes: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 22, 2006
Affirmation of Surety Obligee as "Insured" Under Florida Statutes: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Dadeland Depot,...
Establishing Proper Venue and Procedure for Sentence-Reducing Credit Challenges: BUSH v. STATE

Establishing Proper Venue and Procedure for Sentence-Reducing Credit Challenges: BUSH v. STATE

Date: Dec 22, 2006
Establishing Proper Venue and Procedure for Sentence-Reducing Credit Challenges: BUSH v. STATE Introduction BUSH v. STATE, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on December 21, 2006, addresses...
PIZZO v. STATE: Establishing the Hierarchy of Offenses in Double Jeopardy Cases

PIZZO v. STATE: Establishing the Hierarchy of Offenses in Double Jeopardy Cases

Date: Dec 22, 2006
PIZZO v. STATE: Establishing the Hierarchy of Offenses in Double Jeopardy Cases Introduction In the landmark case of James Frank Pizzo a/k/a James Pizzo, Jr. v. State of Florida, decided by the...
Engle v. Liggett Group: Florida Supreme Court Establishes New Precedents on Punitive Damages and Class Action Decertification in Tobacco Litigation

Engle v. Liggett Group: Florida Supreme Court Establishes New Precedents on Punitive Damages and Class Action Decertification in Tobacco Litigation

Date: Dec 22, 2006
Engle v. Liggett Group: Florida Supreme Court Establishes New Precedents on Punitive Damages and Class Action Decertification in Tobacco Litigation Introduction The case of Howard A. Engle, M.D., et...
Public Policy Exception in Choice of Law for Insurance Contracts: Roach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Public Policy Exception in Choice of Law for Insurance Contracts: Roach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 15, 2006
Public Policy Exception in Choice of Law for Insurance Contracts: Roach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Roach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile...
SIMMONS v. STATE of Florida: Upholding Internet Luring and Transmission Statutes

SIMMONS v. STATE of Florida: Upholding Internet Luring and Transmission Statutes

Date: Nov 17, 2006
SIMMONS v. STATE of Florida: Upholding Internet Luring and Transmission Statutes Introduction The case of Michael John SIMMONS v. STATE of Florida (944 So. 2d 317) presented a pivotal legal question...
Reforming Post-Plea Deportation Consequences: Insights from State v. Green

Reforming Post-Plea Deportation Consequences: Insights from State v. Green

Date: Oct 27, 2006
Reforming Post-Plea Deportation Consequences: Insights from State v. Green Introduction In the landmark case of State of Florida v. Owran Green, decided on October 26, 2006, the Supreme Court of...
Medical Providers’ Right to Enforce HMO Prompt Pay Provisions as Third-Party Beneficiaries – Florida Supreme Court Ruling

Medical Providers’ Right to Enforce HMO Prompt Pay Provisions as Third-Party Beneficiaries – Florida Supreme Court Ruling

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Medical Providers’ Right to Enforce HMO Prompt Pay Provisions as Third-Party Beneficiaries – Florida Supreme Court Ruling Introduction The case of Foundation Health, et al. v. Westside EKG Associates...
Reynolds v. State of Florida: Affirmation of Death Sentences Under Strict Aggravating Circumstances

Reynolds v. State of Florida: Affirmation of Death Sentences Under Strict Aggravating Circumstances

Date: Jul 12, 2006
Reynolds v. State of Florida: Affirmation of Death Sentences Under Strict Aggravating Circumstances Introduction The case of Michael Gordon Reynolds v. State of Florida, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Supreme Court of Florida Limits Imposition of Statutory Surcharges on Juvenile Delinquents

Supreme Court of Florida Limits Imposition of Statutory Surcharges on Juvenile Delinquents

Date: Jul 7, 2006
Supreme Court of Florida Limits Imposition of Statutory Surcharges on Juvenile Delinquents Introduction The case V.K.E., etc., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent (934 So. 2d 1276) addresses...
Admissibility of Collateral Child Molestation Evidence Under Section 90.404(2)(b): Analysis of McLEAN v. STATE

Admissibility of Collateral Child Molestation Evidence Under Section 90.404(2)(b): Analysis of McLEAN v. STATE

Date: Jul 7, 2006
Admissibility of Collateral Child Molestation Evidence Under Section 90.404(2)(b): Analysis of McLEAN v. STATE Introduction Ronald McLEAN v. STATE of Florida is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Workers' Compensation Immunity in Intentional Tort Actions

Florida Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Workers' Compensation Immunity in Intentional Tort Actions

Date: Jun 16, 2006
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Workers' Compensation Immunity in Intentional Tort Actions Introduction The case of Curtis JONES, et ux., Petitioners, v. MARTIN ELECTRONICS, INC., decided by...
Florida Supreme Court Affirms Offer of Judgment Statute Applies to PIP Suits, Emphasizing Particularity Requirements

Florida Supreme Court Affirms Offer of Judgment Statute Applies to PIP Suits, Emphasizing Particularity Requirements

Date: Jun 2, 2006
Florida Supreme Court Affirms Offer of Judgment Statute Applies to PIP Suits, Emphasizing Particularity Requirements Introduction In the landmark case of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance...
Affirmation of Richard England's Death Sentence: Comprehensive Analysis of Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing in Florida Supreme Court

Affirmation of Richard England's Death Sentence: Comprehensive Analysis of Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing in Florida Supreme Court

Date: May 26, 2006
Affirmation of Richard England's Death Sentence: Comprehensive Analysis of Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing in Florida Supreme Court Introduction The case of Richard England v. State of Florida...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert