Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Section 300(b)(1) Dependency Jurisdiction Clarified: No Parental Fault Required

Section 300(b)(1) Dependency Jurisdiction Clarified: No Parental Fault Required

Date: Jul 21, 2017
Section 300(b)(1) Dependency Jurisdiction Clarified: No Parental Fault Required Introduction In the case of In re R.T., the Supreme Court of California addressed a pivotal issue concerning the...
The People v. Kiongozi Jones: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence in a Complex Gang-related Murder Case

The People v. Kiongozi Jones: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence in a Complex Gang-related Murder Case

Date: Jul 21, 2017
The People v. Kiongozi Jones: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence in a Complex Gang-related Murder Case Introduction The People v. Kiongozi Jones is a significant judgment by the Supreme...
Broadening Discovery Scope in PAGA Actions: Williams v. Superior Court

Broadening Discovery Scope in PAGA Actions: Williams v. Superior Court

Date: Jul 14, 2017
Broadening Discovery Scope in PAGA Actions: Williams v. Superior Court Introduction In Michael Williams v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 3 Cal.5th 531 (2017), the Supreme Court of...
Narrow Interpretation of 'Unreasonable Risk' in Proposition 47 Does Not Amend the Three Strikes Reform Act

Narrow Interpretation of 'Unreasonable Risk' in Proposition 47 Does Not Amend the Three Strikes Reform Act

Date: Jul 4, 2017
Narrow Interpretation of 'Unreasonable Risk' in Proposition 47 Does Not Amend the Three Strikes Reform Act Introduction The California Supreme Court case The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Affirmation of Jury Waiver Standards in Capital Cases: People v. Sivongxxay

Affirmation of Jury Waiver Standards in Capital Cases: People v. Sivongxxay

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Affirmation of Jury Waiver Standards in Capital Cases: People v. Sivongxxay Introduction People v. Vaene Sivongxxay is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that delves into the...
Supreme Court of California Affirms Limits on Implied Dedication of Private Noncoastal Roadways under Civil Code §1009(b)

Supreme Court of California Affirms Limits on Implied Dedication of Private Noncoastal Roadways under Civil Code §1009(b)

Date: Jun 16, 2017
Supreme Court of California Affirms Limits on Implied Dedication of Private Noncoastal Roadways under Civil Code §1009(b) Introduction The case of Jaime A. Scher et al. v. John F. Burke et al....
Clarifying 'Verbal Statements' under Penal Code Section 422: Exclusion of Nonverbal Conduct in Criminal Threats

Clarifying 'Verbal Statements' under Penal Code Section 422: Exclusion of Nonverbal Conduct in Criminal Threats

Date: Jun 2, 2017
Clarifying 'Verbal Statements' under Penal Code Section 422: Exclusion of Nonverbal Conduct in Criminal Threats Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Mario Alberto Gonzalez, 2 Cal.5th 1138...
Clarifying Batson/Wheeler Standards in Jury Selection: People v. Gutierrez, Ramos, & Enriquez

Clarifying Batson/Wheeler Standards in Jury Selection: People v. Gutierrez, Ramos, & Enriquez

Date: Jun 2, 2017
Clarifying Batson/Wheeler Standards in Jury Selection: People v. Gutierrez, Ramos, & Enriquez Introduction People v. Gutierrez, Ramos, & Enriquez (2 Cal.5th 1150, 2017) is a landmark decision by the...
Weekly Day of Rest Guarantee Under California Labor Law: Mendoza v. Nordstrom

Weekly Day of Rest Guarantee Under California Labor Law: Mendoza v. Nordstrom

Date: May 9, 2017
Weekly Day of Rest Guarantee Under California Labor Law: Mendoza v. Nordstrom Introduction In the landmark case of Christopher Mendoza, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Nordstrom, Inc., Defendant and...
Park v. Board of Trustees: Defining the Boundaries of Anti-SLAPP in Employment Discrimination Cases

Park v. Board of Trustees: Defining the Boundaries of Anti-SLAPP in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: May 5, 2017
Park v. Board of Trustees: Defining the Boundaries of Anti-SLAPP in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction Sungho Park, a Korean national and tenure-track assistant professor at California...
Section 1170(d)(2) Insufficient to Address Miller Error in Juvenile Sentences

Section 1170(d)(2) Insufficient to Address Miller Error in Juvenile Sentences

Date: Apr 25, 2017
Section 1170(d)(2) Insufficient to Address Miller Error in Juvenile Sentences Introduction In In re Kristopher Kirchner on Habeas Corpus (2 Cal.5th 1040, 2017), the Supreme Court of California...
California Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitration Waiver of Public Injunctive Relief in McGill v. Citibank

California Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitration Waiver of Public Injunctive Relief in McGill v. Citibank

Date: Apr 7, 2017
California Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitration Waiver of Public Injunctive Relief in McGill v. Citibank Introduction McGill v. Citibank, N.A. (2 Cal.5th 945) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach: Integrating CEQA with Coastal Act Requirements

Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach: Integrating CEQA with Coastal Act Requirements

Date: Mar 31, 2017
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach: Integrating CEQA with Coastal Act Requirements Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City...
Impact of Proposition 47 on Theft of Access Card Information: Analysis of People v. Romanowski

Impact of Proposition 47 on Theft of Access Card Information: Analysis of People v. Romanowski

Date: Mar 28, 2017
Impact of Proposition 47 on Theft of Access Card Information: Analysis of People v. Romanowski Introduction People v. Daniel Romanowski is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Revisiting Withdrawals of Guilty Pleas: The People v. Patterson Decision

Revisiting Withdrawals of Guilty Pleas: The People v. Patterson Decision

Date: Mar 28, 2017
Revisiting Withdrawals of Guilty Pleas: The People v. Patterson Decision Introduction The People v. Ron Douglas Patterson, 2 Cal.5th 885 (2017) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of Shoplifting Under Proposition 47: The PEOPLE v. Gio

Interpretation of Shoplifting Under Proposition 47: The PEOPLE v. Gio

Date: Mar 24, 2017
Interpretation of Shoplifting Under Proposition 47: The PEOPLE v. Gio Introduction The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Giovanni Gonzales (2 Cal.5th 858) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Comprehensive Review of Felony-Murder Special Circumstances and Jury Instructions: The PEOPLE v. Donald Lewis Brooks

Comprehensive Review of Felony-Murder Special Circumstances and Jury Instructions: The PEOPLE v. Donald Lewis Brooks

Date: Mar 21, 2017
Comprehensive Review of Felony-Murder Special Circumstances and Jury Instructions: The PEOPLE v. Donald Lewis Brooks Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Donald Lewis...
Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Insights from People v. Merritt

Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Insights from People v. Merritt

Date: Mar 21, 2017
Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Insights from People v. Merritt Introduction People v. Andre Merritt (2 Cal.5th 819, 2017) presents a pivotal analysis of the appellate standard...
Implicit Mens Rea in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Hall

Implicit Mens Rea in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Hall

Date: Feb 10, 2017
Implicit Mens Rea in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Hall Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LaQuincy HALL, Defendant and Appellant (2 Cal.5th 494)...
The PEOPLE v. Winbush: Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Implications for Jury Selection Practices

The PEOPLE v. Winbush: Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Implications for Jury Selection Practices

Date: Jan 27, 2017
The PEOPLE v. Winbush: Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Implications for Jury Selection Practices Introduction The PEOPLE v. Grayland Winbush (2 Cal.5th 402) is a landmark decision by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert