Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Substantial Evidence Requirement for Permanent Disability in Arkansas Workmen's Compensation: Dena Construction Co. v. Herndon

Substantial Evidence Requirement for Permanent Disability in Arkansas Workmen's Compensation: Dena Construction Co. v. Herndon

Date: Jan 9, 1979
Substantial Evidence Requirement for Permanent Disability in Arkansas Workmen's Compensation: Dena Construction Co. v. Herndon Introduction The case of Dena Construction Company and Southern Farm...
Statutory Interpretation of Heroin Possession Under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Roy Lee Dixon v. State of Arkansas

Statutory Interpretation of Heroin Possession Under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Roy Lee Dixon v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jan 11, 1977
Statutory Interpretation of Heroin Possession Under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Roy Lee Dixon v. State of Arkansas Introduction Roy Lee Dixon v. State of Arkansas, decided by...
Admissibility of Similar Occurrences in Negligence Cases: Arkansas Power and Light Co. v. Johnson

Admissibility of Similar Occurrences in Negligence Cases: Arkansas Power and Light Co. v. Johnson

Date: Jul 13, 1976
Admissibility of Similar Occurrences in Negligence Cases: Arkansas Power and Light Co. v. Johnson Introduction The case of Arkansas Power and Light Co. v. Jetta Catherine Johnson, decided by the...
Constitutionality of Death Penalty and Jury Selection Standards in Lanny Paul Venable v. State of Arkansas

Constitutionality of Death Penalty and Jury Selection Standards in Lanny Paul Venable v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jul 13, 1976
Constitutionality of Death Penalty and Jury Selection Standards in Lanny Paul Venable v. State of Arkansas Introduction Lanny Paul Venable v. State of Arkansas is a landmark 1976 judgment by the...
Procedural Standards for General Assembly-Proposed Constitutional Amendments: Insights from Chaney v. Bryant

Procedural Standards for General Assembly-Proposed Constitutional Amendments: Insights from Chaney v. Bryant

Date: Feb 18, 1976
Procedural Standards for General Assembly-Proposed Constitutional Amendments: Insights from Chaney v. Bryant Introduction Harry M. CHANEY et al v. Kelly BRYANT, Secretary of State is a pivotal case...
Supreme Court of Arkansas Establishes Strict Compliance with Mandatory Probate Procedures in Price v. Price

Supreme Court of Arkansas Establishes Strict Compliance with Mandatory Probate Procedures in Price v. Price

Date: Apr 17, 1973
Supreme Court of Arkansas Establishes Strict Compliance with Mandatory Probate Procedures in Price v. Price Introduction Price v. Price, decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on April 16, 1973, is...
Enhanced Duty of Care for Electric Utilities: Insights from Woodruff Electric Co. v. T.J. Daniel

Enhanced Duty of Care for Electric Utilities: Insights from Woodruff Electric Co. v. T.J. Daniel

Date: Nov 23, 1971
Enhanced Duty of Care for Electric Utilities: Insights from Woodruff Electric Co. v. T.J. Daniel Introduction Woodruff Electric Cooperative Corporation v. T.J. Daniel is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Open Meetings under Freedom of Information Act Over Attorney-Client Privilege

Affirmation of Open Meetings under Freedom of Information Act Over Attorney-Client Privilege

Date: Oct 22, 1968
Affirmation of Open Meetings under Freedom of Information Act Over Attorney-Client Privilege Introduction The case W. F. LAMAN, et al v. Robert S. McCORD et al (245 Ark. 401), adjudicated by the...
Enhanced Debtor Rights under UCC: Insights from Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine Bluff

Enhanced Debtor Rights under UCC: Insights from Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine Bluff

Date: Feb 1, 1966
Enhanced Debtor Rights under UCC: Insights from Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine Bluff Introduction The case of Norton v. National Bank of Commerce of Pine Bluff, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Exceptions to the "Going and Coming" Rule in Workers' Compensation and Circuit Court Authority to Remand: Mason v. Lauck Analysis

Exceptions to the "Going and Coming" Rule in Workers' Compensation and Circuit Court Authority to Remand: Mason v. Lauck Analysis

Date: Dec 13, 1960
Exceptions to the "Going and Coming" Rule in Workers' Compensation and Circuit Court Authority to Remand: Mason v. Lauck Analysis Introduction Mason v. Lauck (232 Ark. 891) is a landmark decision...
Leigh and Thomas v. Hall: Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedents for Ballot Title Sufficiency in Initiated Measures

Leigh and Thomas v. Hall: Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedents for Ballot Title Sufficiency in Initiated Measures

Date: Oct 18, 1960
Leigh and Thomas v. Hall: Arkansas Supreme Court Sets Precedents for Ballot Title Sufficiency in Initiated Measures Introduction The case of Leigh and Thomas v. Hall, Secretary of State (232 Ark....
Hoban v. Hall (1958): Establishing Standards for Ballot Title Sufficiency in Initiative Referendums

Hoban v. Hall (1958): Establishing Standards for Ballot Title Sufficiency in Initiative Referendums

Date: Sep 30, 1958
Hoban v. Hall (1958): Establishing Standards for Ballot Title Sufficiency in Initiative Referendums Introduction Hoban v. Hall, 229 Ark. 416 (1958), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Enhanced Jury Instructions and the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Rape Cases: Insights from Alford v. State

Enhanced Jury Instructions and the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Rape Cases: Insights from Alford v. State

Date: Apr 27, 1954
Enhanced Jury Instructions and the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Rape Cases: Insights from Alford v. State Introduction Alford v. State (223 Ark. 330), decided by the Supreme Court of...
Electric Companies' Duty of Ordinary and Reasonable Care in Workplace Safety: Arkansas Power Light Co. v. Lum

Electric Companies' Duty of Ordinary and Reasonable Care in Workplace Safety: Arkansas Power Light Co. v. Lum

Date: Jan 12, 1954
Electric Companies' Duty of Ordinary and Reasonable Care in Workplace Safety: Arkansas Power Light Co. v. Lum Introduction The case of Arkansas Power Light Company v. Lum (222 Ark. 678) adjudicated...
Pafford v. Hall: Establishing the Standard for Challenging Initiative Petitions on Grounds of Affidavit Fraud

Pafford v. Hall: Establishing the Standard for Challenging Initiative Petitions on Grounds of Affidavit Fraud

Date: Oct 17, 1950
Pafford v. Hall: Establishing the Standard for Challenging Initiative Petitions on Grounds of Affidavit Fraud Introduction Case: Pafford v. Hall, Secretary of State Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas...
Res Judicata and Injunctive Relief: Insights from Smith v. Magnet Cove Barium Corporation

Res Judicata and Injunctive Relief: Insights from Smith v. Magnet Cove Barium Corporation

Date: Dec 9, 1947
Res Judicata and Injunctive Relief: Insights from Smith v. Magnet Cove Barium Corporation Introduction The case of Smith v. Magnet Cove Barium Corporation (212 Ark. 491, 1947) adjudicated by the...
Sufficiency of Ballot Titles: Walton v. McDonald and Its Legal Implications

Sufficiency of Ballot Titles: Walton v. McDonald and Its Legal Implications

Date: Oct 16, 1936
Sufficiency of Ballot Titles: Walton v. McDonald and Its Legal Implications Introduction The case of Walton v. McDonald, Secretary of State, decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on October 15,...
Establishing Prima Facie Negligence in Power Line Failures: Insights from Arkansas General Utilities Co. v. Shipman

Establishing Prima Facie Negligence in Power Line Failures: Insights from Arkansas General Utilities Co. v. Shipman

Date: Jan 16, 1934
Establishing Prima Facie Negligence in Power Line Failures: Insights from Arkansas General Utilities Co. v. Shipman Introduction The case of Arkansas General Utilities Company v. Shipman, decided by...
Duty of Electric Companies to Insulate Wires: Arkansas Power Light Company v. Cates

Duty of Electric Companies to Insulate Wires: Arkansas Power Light Company v. Cates

Date: Jan 28, 1930
Duty of Electric Companies to Insulate Wires: Arkansas Power Light Company v. Cates Introduction Arkansas Power Light Company v. Cates (180 Ark. 1003), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert