Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Exclusive Contract Approach to Wrongful Discharge Under Public Policy: Analysis of Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Charles G. Oxford

Exclusive Contract Approach to Wrongful Discharge Under Public Policy: Analysis of Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Charles G. Oxford

Date: Apr 5, 1988
Exclusive Contract Approach to Wrongful Discharge Under Public Policy: Analysis of Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Charles G. Oxford Introduction Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Charles G. Oxford (747 S.W.2d 579) is a...
Wilburn Fowler v. Tom McHenry: Equal Weight to Evidence Standard in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Claims

Wilburn Fowler v. Tom McHenry: Equal Weight to Evidence Standard in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Claims

Date: Oct 15, 1987
Wilburn Fowler v. Tom McHenry: Equal Weight to Evidence Standard in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Claims Introduction Wilburn Fowler v. Tom McHenry, et al. is a pivotal case decided by the Court of...
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Obscenity Statute in 4000 Asher, Inc. v. State of Arkansas

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Obscenity Statute in 4000 Asher, Inc. v. State of Arkansas

Date: Sep 23, 1986
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Obscenity Statute in 4000 Asher, Inc. v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of 4000 Asher, Inc. v. State of Arkansas revolves around the legality of prosecuting a...
Prioritizing Sufficiency of Evidence in Appellate Review: Insights from Harris v. Arkansas

Prioritizing Sufficiency of Evidence in Appellate Review: Insights from Harris v. Arkansas

Date: Dec 18, 1984
Prioritizing Sufficiency of Evidence in Appellate Review: Insights from Harris v. Arkansas Introduction The case of Cullen Reed Harris and Sandra Kay HARRIS v. STATE of Arkansas (284 Ark. 247)...
Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. Riviere: Upholding Ballot Title Integrity

Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. Riviere: Upholding Ballot Title Integrity

Date: Oct 25, 1984
Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. Riviere: Upholding Ballot Title Integrity Introduction In Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. The Honorable Paul Riviere (1984), the Supreme Court of Arkansas...
Substantial Evidence Standard and Physician Change Protocol in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law

Substantial Evidence Standard and Physician Change Protocol in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law

Date: Oct 11, 1984
Substantial Evidence Standard and Physician Change Protocol in Arkansas Workers' Compensation Law Introduction The case of Wright Contracting Co., Employer and Insurance Company of North America,...
Precedent on Harmless Error and Jury Selection: Rickie Earn Berna v. State of Arkansas (1984)

Precedent on Harmless Error and Jury Selection: Rickie Earn Berna v. State of Arkansas (1984)

Date: Jun 5, 1984
Precedent on Harmless Error and Jury Selection: Rickie Earn Berna v. State of Arkansas (1984) Introduction Rickie Earn Berna v. State of Arkansas is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming the Writ of Error Coram Nobis in Arkansas: Insights from Allen Lynn Penn v. State of Arkansas

Reaffirming the Writ of Error Coram Nobis in Arkansas: Insights from Allen Lynn Penn v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jun 5, 1984
Reaffirming the Writ of Error Coram Nobis in Arkansas: Insights from Allen Lynn Penn v. State of Arkansas Introduction The case of Allen Lynn Penn v. State of Arkansas (282 Ark. 571) marks a...
Determining Wage Loss Disability in Workers' Compensation: Insights from City of Fayetteville v. James R. Guess

Determining Wage Loss Disability in Workers' Compensation: Insights from City of Fayetteville v. James R. Guess

Date: Feb 9, 1984
Determining Wage Loss Disability in Workers' Compensation: Insights from City of Fayetteville v. James R. Guess Introduction City of Fayetteville v. James R. Guess is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Government Retirees: A Comprehensive Analysis of James W. Streight et al v. Charles D. Ragland

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Government Retirees: A Comprehensive Analysis of James W. Streight et al v. Charles D. Ragland

Date: Sep 20, 1983
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Government Retirees: A Comprehensive Analysis of James W. Streight et al v. Charles D. Ragland Introduction The case of James W. Streight et al v....
Liability in Workers' Compensation: Distinguishing Aggravation from Recurrence – Bearden Lumber Co. v. Bond

Liability in Workers' Compensation: Distinguishing Aggravation from Recurrence – Bearden Lumber Co. v. Bond

Date: Jan 6, 1983
Liability in Workers' Compensation: Distinguishing Aggravation from Recurrence – Bearden Lumber Co. v. Bond Introduction The case of Bearden Lumber Company v. Bobby Bond and Liberty Mutual Insurance...
Pearline Oller v. Champion Parts Rebuilders: Reaffirming the Workers' Compensation Commission’s Authority in Disability Assessments

Pearline Oller v. Champion Parts Rebuilders: Reaffirming the Workers' Compensation Commission’s Authority in Disability Assessments

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Pearline Oller v. Champion Parts Rebuilders: Reaffirming the Workers' Compensation Commission’s Authority in Disability Assessments Introduction The case of Pearline Oller v. Champion Parts...
Establishing Flexibility in Evidence Submission for Total Permanent Disability in Workers' Compensation Cases

Establishing Flexibility in Evidence Submission for Total Permanent Disability in Workers' Compensation Cases

Date: May 27, 1982
Establishing Flexibility in Evidence Submission for Total Permanent Disability in Workers' Compensation Cases Introduction The case of A.G. Haygood and Rockwood Insurance Company v. Jessie Lee...
Establishing Quorum and Healing Period Standards in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Mad Butcher, Inc. v. Carl Parker

Establishing Quorum and Healing Period Standards in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Mad Butcher, Inc. v. Carl Parker

Date: Mar 25, 1982
Establishing Quorum and Healing Period Standards in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Mad Butcher, Inc. Continental Insurance Company v. Carl Parker Introduction The case of Mad Butcher, Inc....
Wayne Wicks v. State of Arkansas: Reinforcing Jury Guidelines Exclusively for Capital Cases

Wayne Wicks v. State of Arkansas: Reinforcing Jury Guidelines Exclusively for Capital Cases

Date: Oct 21, 1980
Wayne Wicks v. State of Arkansas: Reinforcing Jury Guidelines Exclusively for Capital Cases Introduction Wayne Wicks v. State of Arkansas, 270 Ark. 781 (1980), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Sufficiency and Clarity in Ballot Titles: Analyzing Becker & Jacobs v. Riviere

Sufficiency and Clarity in Ballot Titles: Analyzing Becker & Jacobs v. Riviere

Date: Sep 16, 1980
Sufficiency and Clarity in Ballot Titles: Analyzing Becker & Jacobs v. Riviere Introduction The case of J. Bill Becker and E. J. Jacobs v. Paul Riviere, decided by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on...
Recognition of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in At-Will Employment Discharges

Recognition of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in At-Will Employment Discharges

Date: Mar 25, 1980
Recognition of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in At-Will Employment Discharges Introduction M.B.M. Company, Inc. v. Shirley Ann Counce (268 Ark. 269, 1980) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Comprehensive Commentary on Clyde A. Ferguson et al v. James Green et al (266 Ark. 556)

Comprehensive Commentary on Clyde A. Ferguson et al v. James Green et al (266 Ark. 556)

Date: Oct 2, 1979
Contractual Remedies and Appellate Review: Insights from Clyde A. Ferguson et al v. James Green et al Introduction The case of Clyde A. Ferguson et al v. James Green et al (266 Ark. 556) adjudicated...
Supreme Court of Arkansas Clarifies Substantial Evidence Standard in Workmen's Compensation Appeals

Supreme Court of Arkansas Clarifies Substantial Evidence Standard in Workmen's Compensation Appeals

Date: Apr 17, 1979
Supreme Court of Arkansas Clarifies Substantial Evidence Standard in Workmen's Compensation Appeals Introduction The case of Shirley Clark, Widow v. Peabody Testing Service (265 Ark. 489) adjudicated...
Clarification of Burden of Proof and Evidence Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: O.K. Processing v. Servold

Clarification of Burden of Proof and Evidence Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: O.K. Processing v. Servold

Date: Mar 27, 1979
Clarification of Burden of Proof and Evidence Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: O.K. Processing v. Servold Introduction The case of O.K. Processing, Inc. and Mills Mutual Insurance Company...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert