Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

unconstitutionality-of-section-27(3f)-of-the-misuse-of-drugs-act:-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-mcmanus-v.-the-minister-for-justice-and-equality- Case Commentaries

Redefining Ombudsman Jurisdiction over Academic Discrimination Complaints

Redefining Ombudsman Jurisdiction over Academic Discrimination Complaints

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Redefining Ombudsman Jurisdiction over Academic Discrimination Complaints Introduction The judgment, AB against the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (Court of Session) [2025] CSIH 8, delivered on...
Non-Proving Executors Without Immediate Standing in Ombudsman Complaints: A Landmark Decision in Kiernan v Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman

Non-Proving Executors Without Immediate Standing in Ombudsman Complaints: A Landmark Decision in Kiernan v Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Non-Proving Executors Without Immediate Standing in Ombudsman Complaints A Landmark Decision in Kiernan v Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman ([2025] IEHC 138) Introduction The judgment in...
New Precedent on the Irrevocability of Statutory Time Limits for Election Petitions

New Precedent on the Irrevocability of Statutory Time Limits for Election Petitions

Date: Mar 13, 2025
New Precedent on the Irrevocability of Statutory Time Limits for Election Petitions Introduction This commentary examines the High Court’s decision in Kiernan v Financial Services and Pensions...
Defining the Trigger for Collective Redundancy Consultations – From Board Insolvency Decisions to Early Information Provision

Defining the Trigger for Collective Redundancy Consultations – From Board Insolvency Decisions to Early Information Provision

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Defining the Trigger for Collective Redundancy Consultations – From Board Insolvency Decisions to Early Information Provision Introduction The case of Debenhams Retail Ireland Limited (in...
Judicial Finality and the Curbing of Unqualified Litigation Advisers: A Landmark Decision in Barrington & Anor -v-Attorney General & Ors

Judicial Finality and the Curbing of Unqualified Litigation Advisers: A Landmark Decision in Barrington & Anor -v-Attorney General & Ors

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Judicial Finality and the Curbing of Unqualified Litigation Advisers: A Landmark Decision in Barrington & Anor -v-Attorney General & Ors Introduction The case of Barrington & Anor -v-Attorney General...
Clarifying the Limits of Rule 18.24 & 18.28: Administrator Remuneration and the Time‐Cost Basis

Clarifying the Limits of Rule 18.24 & 18.28: Administrator Remuneration and the Time‐Cost Basis

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Rule 18.24 & 18.28: Administrator Remuneration and the Time‐Cost Basis Introduction The case of Frost & Anor v The Good Box Co Labs Ltd & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 252) presents...
Reevaluating Judicial Directives: Mandating Re-Trial under s. 23(11) of the 2010 Act

Reevaluating Judicial Directives: Mandating Re-Trial under s. 23(11) of the 2010 Act

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Reevaluating Judicial Directives: Mandating Re-Trial under s. 23(11) of the 2010 Act Introduction The Judgment in Director of Public Prosecutions v JB; Director of Public Prosecutions v SM ([2025]...
Clarifying the Threshold of Awareness: Determining a "Significant Role" in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Clarifying the Threshold of Awareness: Determining a "Significant Role" in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Clarifying the Threshold of Awareness: Determining a "Significant Role" in Drug Conspiracy Cases Introduction In Dobre, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 370), the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Judicial Authority to Address Inaccurate Agreed Facts in Summing-Up – Arachchige v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 363)

Judicial Authority to Address Inaccurate Agreed Facts in Summing-Up – Arachchige v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 363)

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Judicial Authority to Address Inaccurate Agreed Facts in Summing-Up – Arachchige v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 363) Introduction Arachchige v R is a 2025 decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal...
“One Bite of the Cherry”: The Court of Appeal Clarifies How to Avoid Double-Counting When Applying
            Sentencing Guidelines for “Causing or Allowing the Death of a Child”

“One Bite of the Cherry”: The Court of Appeal Clarifies How to Avoid Double-Counting When Applying Sentencing Guidelines for “Causing or Allowing the Death of a Child”

Date: Mar 13, 2025
“One Bite of the Cherry” – The Court of Appeal Clarifies How to Avoid Double-Counting in Step-Based Sentencing for Child-Death Offences (Commentary on Gleason-Mitchell, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 874) 1....
Clarke v Revenue: Establishing the Standard for a Valid Business Transfer in Tax Appeals

Clarke v Revenue: Establishing the Standard for a Valid Business Transfer in Tax Appeals

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Clarke v Revenue: Establishing the Standard for a Valid Business Transfer in Tax Appeals Introduction The judgment in Clarke v Revenue ([2025] IEHC 182), delivered by Mr. Justice Cregan on 12 March...
Clarifying Receivership Validity and Dismissal Motions: New Precedents under O.19, r.28

Clarifying Receivership Validity and Dismissal Motions: New Precedents under O.19, r.28

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Clarifying Receivership Validity and Dismissal Motions: New Precedents under O.19, r.28 Introduction The judgment in Davey v Wallace & Anor ([2025] IEHC 146) presents a detailed examination of the...
Differential Costs Orders and Jurisdictional Nuances in Family Assault Cases: Precedent from Quinlan v Quinlan ([2025] IEHC 170)

Differential Costs Orders and Jurisdictional Nuances in Family Assault Cases: Precedent from Quinlan v Quinlan ([2025] IEHC 170)

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Differential Costs Orders and Jurisdictional Nuances in Family Assault Cases: Precedent from Quinlan v Quinlan ([2025] IEHC 170) Introduction The case of Quinlan v Quinlan (Approved) ([2025] IEHC...
Defamation Proceedings and the Limits of Strike-Out Jurisdiction: Guerin v O'Doherty [2025] IEHC 140

Defamation Proceedings and the Limits of Strike-Out Jurisdiction: Guerin v O'Doherty [2025] IEHC 140

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Defamation Proceedings and the Limits of Strike-Out Jurisdiction: Guerin v O'Doherty [2025] IEHC 140 Introduction The case of Guerin v O'Doherty represents a complex and multifaceted defamation...
Strict Compliance with Appeal Deadlines and Fresh Evidence Thresholds in Criminal Appeals

Strict Compliance with Appeal Deadlines and Fresh Evidence Thresholds in Criminal Appeals

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Strict Compliance with Appeal Deadlines and Fresh Evidence Thresholds in Criminal Appeals Introduction R. v Woroniecki [2025] EWCA Crim 364 is a decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal...
Enhanced Accountability for Public Safety in Hotel Operations: LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220)

Enhanced Accountability for Public Safety in Hotel Operations: LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220)

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Enhanced Accountability for Public Safety in Hotel Operations: LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220) Introduction The case of LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220) before...
Age at Sentencing and Review Rights in DHMP: Balancing Rehabilitation, Victim Interests, and Arbitrary Detention

Age at Sentencing and Review Rights in DHMP: Balancing Rehabilitation, Victim Interests, and Arbitrary Detention

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Age at Sentencing and Review Rights in DHMP: Balancing Rehabilitation, Victim Interests, and Arbitrary Detention Introduction The case of Quaye, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for...
Balancing Discretion and Procedural Fairness in Sponsor Licence Revocation: New Precedents on Impact Assessment

Balancing Discretion and Procedural Fairness in Sponsor Licence Revocation: New Precedents on Impact Assessment

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Balancing Discretion and Procedural Fairness in Sponsor Licence Revocation: New Precedents on Impact Assessment Introduction The judgment in Prestwick Care Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v...
Clarifying the Extent of a Reporter’s Remit: Exhaustion of Jurisdiction and Value Assignment in Lease Repair Disputes

Clarifying the Extent of a Reporter’s Remit: Exhaustion of Jurisdiction and Value Assignment in Lease Repair Disputes

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Clarifying the Extent of a Reporter’s Remit: Exhaustion of Jurisdiction and Value Assignment in Lease Repair Disputes Introduction The case of Rutland Court Real Estate against Anderson Strathern LLP...
Evolving Evidentiary Standards and Pleading Rigor in Construction Litigation: The Ballymore v Roadstone Precedent

Evolving Evidentiary Standards and Pleading Rigor in Construction Litigation: The Ballymore v Roadstone Precedent

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Evolving Evidentiary Standards and Pleading Rigor in Construction Litigation: The Ballymore v Roadstone Precedent Introduction This commentary examines the recent High Court decision in Ballymore...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.