Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

burden-of-proof-and-admissibility-of-evidence-in-tax-appeals:-an-analysis-of-o& Case Commentaries

Clarifying “Necessity” in Fact-Finding Hearings: G (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 1044

Clarifying “Necessity” in Fact-Finding Hearings: G (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 1044

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Clarifying “Necessity” in Fact-Finding Hearings: The Material-Impact Test Confirmed in G (A Child: Scope of Fact-Finding) [2025] EWCA Civ 1044 1. Introduction G (A Child: Scope of Fact-Finding)...
Begum v Tower Hamlets: When Does an Administrative “Transfer List” Become a PCP?  – A New Guidepost on Indirect Sex Discrimination & Local-Authority Housing Duties

Begum v Tower Hamlets: When Does an Administrative “Transfer List” Become a PCP? – A New Guidepost on Indirect Sex Discrimination & Local-Authority Housing Duties

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Begum v London Borough of Tower Hamlets: When Does an Administrative “Transfer List” Become a PCP? A Comprehensive Commentary on the Court of Appeal’s Clarification of Indirect Discrimination and...
Disputed Allegations, Fortification & Full-and-Frank Disclosure: 
          A Commentary on Astor Asset Management 3 Ltd & Ors v Pliego & Anor 
          ([2025] EWCA Civ 1060)

Disputed Allegations, Fortification & Full-and-Frank Disclosure: A Commentary on Astor Asset Management 3 Ltd & Ors v Pliego & Anor ([2025] EWCA Civ 1060)

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Disputed Allegations, Fortification & Full-and-Frank Disclosure: A Commentary on Astor Asset Management 3 Ltd & Ors v Pliego & Anor ([2025] EWCA Civ 1060) England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil...
Defining “Stepchild” for Secure Tenancy Succession: Court of Appeal Endorses Bright-Line Rule and Rejects Article 14 Challenge

Defining “Stepchild” for Secure Tenancy Succession: Court of Appeal Endorses Bright-Line Rule and Rejects Article 14 Challenge

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Defining “Stepchild” for Secure Tenancy Succession: Court of Appeal Endorses Bright-Line Rule and Rejects Article 14 Challenge Introduction Abdelrahman v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of...
Doyle & Anor v Dublin City Council: Exceptional Threshold to Set Aside Leave Reaffirmed, with a Duty‑of‑Candour and Intention‑to‑Defend Requirement for Public Bodies

Doyle & Anor v Dublin City Council: Exceptional Threshold to Set Aside Leave Reaffirmed, with a Duty‑of‑Candour and Intention‑to‑Defend Requirement for Public Bodies

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Exceptional Threshold to Set Aside Leave Reaffirmed, with a Duty‑of‑Candour and Intention‑to‑Defend Requirement for Public Bodies: Commentary on Doyle & Anor v Dublin City Council [2025] IEHC 441...
Spontaneity No Shield: The “Farquhar Benchmark” on Punishment Parts for Knife-Murders Aggravated by Post-Offence Conduct

Spontaneity No Shield: The “Farquhar Benchmark” on Punishment Parts for Knife-Murders Aggravated by Post-Offence Conduct

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Spontaneity No Shield: The “Farquhar Benchmark” on Punishment Parts for Knife-Murders Aggravated by Post-Offence Conduct 1. Introduction In John Farquhar v. HMA ([2025] HCJAC 36) the Scottish Appeal...
R v Barker [2025] EWCA Crim 1293: Enforcing the six‑month aggregate cap for consecutive sentences on summary offences; bail failures to run consecutively under the Sentencing Council Guidelines

R v Barker [2025] EWCA Crim 1293: Enforcing the six‑month aggregate cap for consecutive sentences on summary offences; bail failures to run consecutively under the Sentencing Council Guidelines

Date: Aug 2, 2025
R v Barker [2025] EWCA Crim 1293: Enforcing the six‑month aggregate cap for consecutive sentences on summary offences; bail failures to run consecutively under the Sentencing Council Guidelines...
R v Budea [2025] EWCA Crim 1287: Consecutive Extended Sentences for Attacks on “Good Samaritan” Interveners, Totality Calibration, and a Robust Approach to Dangerousness

R v Budea [2025] EWCA Crim 1287: Consecutive Extended Sentences for Attacks on “Good Samaritan” Interveners, Totality Calibration, and a Robust Approach to Dangerousness

Date: Aug 2, 2025
R v Budea [2025] EWCA Crim 1287: Consecutive Extended Sentences for Attacks on “Good Samaritan” Interveners, Totality Calibration, and a Robust Approach to Dangerousness Introduction In R v Budea...
Targeted Domestic Risk Can Justify an Extended Determinate Sentence Even Where Actual Harm Is Category 3: Commentary on R v Wilson [2025] EWCA Crim 1286

Targeted Domestic Risk Can Justify an Extended Determinate Sentence Even Where Actual Harm Is Category 3: Commentary on R v Wilson [2025] EWCA Crim 1286

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Targeted Domestic Risk Can Justify an Extended Determinate Sentence Even Where Actual Harm Is Category 3: R v Wilson [2025] EWCA Crim 1286 Introduction This commentary examines the England and Wales...
R v ECC [2025] EWCA Crim 1173: Dangerousness may be founded on uncontested material from acquitted counts; modern guideline applied with downward adjustment to respect historic maximum

R v ECC [2025] EWCA Crim 1173: Dangerousness may be founded on uncontested material from acquitted counts; modern guideline applied with downward adjustment to respect historic maximum

Date: Aug 2, 2025
R v ECC [2025] EWCA Crim 1173: Dangerousness may be founded on uncontested material from acquitted counts; modern guideline applied with downward adjustment to respect historic maximum Introduction...
Plummer v The King: Reinforcing the Judicial Duty to Halt Un-convincing Hearsay Cases under s.125 Criminal Justice Act 2003

Plummer v The King: Reinforcing the Judicial Duty to Halt Un-convincing Hearsay Cases under s.125 Criminal Justice Act 2003

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Plummer v The King: Reinforcing the Judicial Duty to Halt Un-convincing Hearsay Cases under s.125 Criminal Justice Act 2003 Introduction Plummer v The King ([2025] EWCA Crim 1036) is a landmark...
“Norman v Rex: Jury Autonomy over Same-Complainant Prior Convictions under s.74(3) PACE”

“Norman v Rex: Jury Autonomy over Same-Complainant Prior Convictions under s.74(3) PACE”

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Norman v Rex: Jury Autonomy over Same-Complainant Prior Convictions under s.74(3) PACE Introduction Court & Citation : England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) – [2025] EWCA Crim 966. In...
Gray v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 1042): Clarifying Jury Directions on Consent, Grooming and Reasonable Belief in Rape Prosecutions

Gray v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 1042): Clarifying Jury Directions on Consent, Grooming and Reasonable Belief in Rape Prosecutions

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Gray v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 1042): Clarifying Jury Directions on Consent, Grooming and Reasonable Belief in Rape Prosecutions Introduction In Gray v R the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) revisited...
Planning Merits Held Irrelevant in Forestry Restocking Appeals – Commentary on Smar Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2025] EWCA Civ 1041

Planning Merits Held Irrelevant in Forestry Restocking Appeals – Commentary on Smar Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2025] EWCA Civ 1041

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Planning Merits Held Irrelevant in Forestry Restocking Appeals Smar Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs ([2025] EWCA Civ 1041) Introduction This Court of Appeal...
Re-drawing the Lines: “Similar Arrests” and “Senior Management” under the Insurance Act 2015 — Commentary on Delos Shipholding SA & Ors v Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1019

Re-drawing the Lines: “Similar Arrests” and “Senior Management” under the Insurance Act 2015 — Commentary on Delos Shipholding SA & Ors v Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1019

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Re-drawing the Lines: “Similar Arrests” and “Senior Management” under the Insurance Act 2015 Commentary on Delos Shipholding SA & Ors v Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty SE & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ...
“No-Order Is Not an Option”: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Duty to Sanction Contempt in Family Proceedings – Commentary on B (A Child) (Sentencing In Contempt Proceedings) [2025] EWCA Civ 1048

“No-Order Is Not an Option”: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Duty to Sanction Contempt in Family Proceedings – Commentary on B (A Child) (Sentencing In Contempt Proceedings) [2025] EWCA Civ 1048

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“No-Order Is Not an Option”: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Duty to Sanction Contempt in Family Proceedings – Commentary on B (A Child) (Sentencing In Contempt Proceedings) [2025] EWCA Civ 1048 1....
Strict Invalidity of RTM Claim Notices for Participation-Notice Breaches and the Inclusion of Equitable Lessees as “Qualifying Tenants” – Commentary on Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Company Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1016

Strict Invalidity of RTM Claim Notices for Participation-Notice Breaches and the Inclusion of Equitable Lessees as “Qualifying Tenants” – Commentary on Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Company Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1016

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Strict Invalidity of RTM Claim Notices for Participation-Notice Breaches and the Inclusion of Equitable Lessees as “Qualifying Tenants” Commentary on Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Company...
“From the Furnace, Not the Fence” – Supreme Court Clarifies the Measuring Point for Section 5 of the Cremation Act 1902

“From the Furnace, Not the Fence” – Supreme Court Clarifies the Measuring Point for Section 5 of the Cremation Act 1902

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“From the Furnace, Not the Fence” – Supreme Court Clarifies the Measuring Point for Section 5 of the Cremation Act 1902 Introduction Wathen-Fayed v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and...
Inherent Jurisdiction as the Only Lawful Route for Deprivation of Liberty and Contact Restrictions Not Permissible Under the Assisted Decision‑Making (Capacity) Act 2015: Commentary on HSE v M.T. [2025] IEHC 440

Inherent Jurisdiction as the Only Lawful Route for Deprivation of Liberty and Contact Restrictions Not Permissible Under the Assisted Decision‑Making (Capacity) Act 2015: Commentary on HSE v M.T. [2025] IEHC 440

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Inherent Jurisdiction as the Only Lawful Route for Deprivation of Liberty and Contact Restrictions Not Permissible Under the Assisted Decision‑Making (Capacity) Act 2015: Commentary on HSE v M.T....
“From Poor Cover-Up to High Culpability” – Sami & Salem [2025] EWCA Crim 1115 Re-defines Sentencing for High-Value Vehicle Theft Conspiracies

“From Poor Cover-Up to High Culpability” – Sami & Salem [2025] EWCA Crim 1115 Re-defines Sentencing for High-Value Vehicle Theft Conspiracies

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“From Poor Cover-Up to High Culpability” – Sami & Salem ([2025] EWCA Crim 1115) Re-defines Sentencing for High-Value Vehicle Theft Conspiracies Introduction In Sami & Anor, R v the Court of Appeal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.