Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Sentencing Beyond Guideline Ranges for Borderline Category Domestic GBH with Intent: Commentary on R v Seal [2025] EWCA Crim 1527

Sentencing Beyond Guideline Ranges for Borderline Category Domestic GBH with Intent: Commentary on R v Seal [2025] EWCA Crim 1527

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Sentencing Beyond Guideline Ranges for Borderline Category Domestic GBH with Intent: Commentary on R v Seal [2025] EWCA Crim 1527 1. Introduction This commentary examines the decision of the England...
R v DCB [2025] EWCA Crim 1253: Late Appeals, Counsel Criticism, and Sexual Bad Character Evidence

R v DCB [2025] EWCA Crim 1253: Late Appeals, Counsel Criticism, and Sexual Bad Character Evidence

Date: Sep 12, 2025
R v DCB [2025] EWCA Crim 1253: Late Appeals, Counsel Criticism, and Propensity-Based Bad Character in Sexual Offence Trials Court: England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Citation:...
R v Lindley [2025] EWCA Crim 1213: No Newton Hearing Where Alleged Prior False Allegations Would Not Materially Affect Sentence; Delayed “Provocation” Is Not Significant Mitigation for Attempted Murder

R v Lindley [2025] EWCA Crim 1213: No Newton Hearing Where Alleged Prior False Allegations Would Not Materially Affect Sentence; Delayed “Provocation” Is Not Significant Mitigation for Attempted Murder

Date: Sep 12, 2025
R v Lindley [2025] EWCA Crim 1213: No Newton Hearing Where Alleged Prior False Allegations Would Not Materially Affect Sentence; Delayed “Provocation” Is Not Significant Mitigation for Attempted...
Abuse of Trust Beyond Workplace Hierarchy: Sentencing Framework for Manager–Employee Sexual Assault in R v Mackenzie [2025] EWCA Crim 1526

Abuse of Trust Beyond Workplace Hierarchy: Sentencing Framework for Manager–Employee Sexual Assault in R v Mackenzie [2025] EWCA Crim 1526

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Abuse of Trust Beyond Workplace Hierarchy: Sentencing Framework for Manager–Employee Sexual Assault in R v Mackenzie [2025] EWCA Crim 1526 1. Introduction This commentary considers the decision of...
R v Moss [2025] EWCA Crim 1252: Adjusting Drug Guideline Categories and Suspending Short Custodial Sentences for Rehabilitated Young Offenders

R v Moss [2025] EWCA Crim 1252: Adjusting Drug Guideline Categories and Suspending Short Custodial Sentences for Rehabilitated Young Offenders

Date: Sep 12, 2025
R v Moss [2025] EWCA Crim 1252: Adjusting Drug Guideline Categories and Suspending Short Custodial Sentences for Rehabilitated Young Offenders 1. Introduction This commentary examines the decision of...
Howells [2025] EWCA Crim 1237: Disapplying the “third‑strike” minimum for Class A supply does not justify a non‑custodial sentence—guidelines still require custody and suspended terms should ordinarily be activated (with totality achieved via uplift and concurrency)

Howells [2025] EWCA Crim 1237: Disapplying the “third‑strike” minimum for Class A supply does not justify a non‑custodial sentence—guidelines still require custody and suspended terms should ordinarily be activated (with totality achieved via uplift and concurrency)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Howells [2025] EWCA Crim 1237: Disapplying the “third‑strike” minimum for Class A supply does not justify a non‑custodial sentence—guidelines still require custody and suspended terms should...
Alhayali: “Sufficiently Close” Is a Tribunal Fact‑Evaluation, Not a Pure Question of Law, in Embassy Employment Immunity; Doubts Cast on Aziz and on Using s.5 to Bypass s.4

Alhayali: “Sufficiently Close” Is a Tribunal Fact‑Evaluation, Not a Pure Question of Law, in Embassy Employment Immunity; Doubts Cast on Aziz and on Using s.5 to Bypass s.4

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Alhayali: “Sufficiently Close” Is a Tribunal Fact‑Evaluation, Not a Pure Question of Law, in Embassy Employment Immunity; Doubts Cast on Aziz and on Using s.5 to Bypass s.4 Introduction In Royal...
Kurtaj v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1163: Authority and Funding for Appeals by the Unfit to Plead, and Fairness Limits on Using Prior Convictions as Propensity in s4A Trials

Kurtaj v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1163: Authority and Funding for Appeals by the Unfit to Plead, and Fairness Limits on Using Prior Convictions as Propensity in s4A Trials

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Kurtaj v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1163: Authority and Funding for Appeals by the Unfit to Plead, and Fairness Limits on Using Prior Convictions as Propensity in s4A Trials Introduction This Court of Appeal...
R v Masih & Singh [2025] EWCA Crim 1236: Upward departures in money laundering sentences when underlying drugs harm is identifiable (Ogden-calibrated approach affirmed)

R v Masih & Singh [2025] EWCA Crim 1236: Upward departures in money laundering sentences when underlying drugs harm is identifiable (Ogden-calibrated approach affirmed)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Upward departures in money-laundering sentencing where underlying drugs harm is identifiable: Court of Appeal affirms Ogden-calibrated approach in R v Masih & Singh [2025] EWCA Crim 1236 Citation: R...
Unduly Lenient References: Appellate Deference to Charge Framing and the Suspendability of Category C “Production” Offences — R v Hargrave [2025] EWCA Crim 1233

Unduly Lenient References: Appellate Deference to Charge Framing and the Suspendability of Category C “Production” Offences — R v Hargrave [2025] EWCA Crim 1233

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Unduly Lenient References: Appellate Deference to Charge Framing and the Suspendability of Category C “Production” Offences — R v Hargrave [2025] EWCA Crim 1233 Introduction This commentary analyses...

    R v Smith [2025] EWCA Crim 1251 – Sentencing for Fraudulent Removal of Company Assets:
    Use of Fraud Guidelines, Risk-Based Harm, and the Limited Effect of Restitution and Personal Mitigation

R v Smith [2025] EWCA Crim 1251 – Sentencing for Fraudulent Removal of Company Assets: Use of Fraud Guidelines, Risk-Based Harm, and the Limited Effect of Restitution and Personal Mitigation

Date: Sep 10, 2025
R v Smith [2025] EWCA Crim 1251 – Sentencing for Fraudulent Removal of Company Assets: Use of Fraud Guidelines, Risk-Based Harm, and the Limited Effect of Restitution and Personal Mitigation 1....
No Collateral Article 10 Defence to Breach of Court of Protection Injunctions: Immediate Custody for Repeated, Knowing Contempt — Macpherson v Sunderland City Council [2025] EWCA Civ 1159

No Collateral Article 10 Defence to Breach of Court of Protection Injunctions: Immediate Custody for Repeated, Knowing Contempt — Macpherson v Sunderland City Council [2025] EWCA Civ 1159

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No Collateral Article 10 Defence to Breach of Court of Protection Injunctions: Immediate Custody for Repeated, Knowing Contempt — Macpherson v Sunderland City Council [2025] EWCA Civ 1159...
R v Mikolajczyk [2025] EWCA Crim 1232: A stringent “interests of justice” standard for 12‑year out‑of‑time appeals and the limits on re-trying jury verdicts

R v Mikolajczyk [2025] EWCA Crim 1232: A stringent “interests of justice” standard for 12‑year out‑of‑time appeals and the limits on re-trying jury verdicts

Date: Sep 10, 2025
R v Mikolajczyk [2025] EWCA Crim 1232: A stringent “interests of justice” standard for 12‑year out‑of‑time appeals and the limits on re-trying jury verdicts Introduction In R v Mikolajczyk [2025]...
R v Dervan [2025] EWCA Crim 1525: Evidence‑Based Harm Categorisation in Breaches of Non‑Molestation Orders

R v Dervan [2025] EWCA Crim 1525: Evidence‑Based Harm Categorisation in Breaches of Non‑Molestation Orders

Date: Sep 10, 2025
R v Dervan [2025] EWCA Crim 1525: Evidence‑Based Harm Categorisation in Breaches of Non‑Molestation Orders 1. Introduction The decision in Dervan, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1525 is a sentencing appeal...
R v Bergstrom [2025] EWCA Crim 1301: Voluntary Desistance Requires a Significant Step‑Two Downward Adjustment Under s.10 Guideline, Balanced by Aggravation and Totality

R v Bergstrom [2025] EWCA Crim 1301: Voluntary Desistance Requires a Significant Step‑Two Downward Adjustment Under s.10 Guideline, Balanced by Aggravation and Totality

Date: Sep 10, 2025
R v Bergstrom [2025] EWCA Crim 1301: Voluntary Desistance Requires a Significant Step‑Two Downward Adjustment Under s.10 Guideline, Balanced by Aggravation and Totality Introduction This commentary...
Patel v R: Post‑Brexit closure of EU free‑movement defences to cannabis importation and the confinement of Margiotta to proven low‑THC cases

Patel v R: Post‑Brexit closure of EU free‑movement defences to cannabis importation and the confinement of Margiotta to proven low‑THC cases

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Patel v R: Post‑Brexit closure of EU free‑movement defences to cannabis importation and the confinement of Margiotta to proven low‑THC cases Court: Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), England and...
Evans v R: OSGs Can Be Public Officers; Likely Consequences, Not Proven Harm, Define Seriousness in Misconduct in Public Office

Evans v R: OSGs Can Be Public Officers; Likely Consequences, Not Proven Harm, Define Seriousness in Misconduct in Public Office

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Evans v R: OSGs Can Be Public Officers; Likely Consequences, Not Proven Harm, Define Seriousness in Misconduct in Public Office Introduction In Evans v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 1150), the Court of Appeal...
Potanina v Potanin (No. 2): Aligning the Part III Leave Threshold with a “Real Prospect of Success” and confirming (pre‑Brexit) Maintenance Regulation constraints on forum objections

Potanina v Potanin (No. 2): Aligning the Part III Leave Threshold with a “Real Prospect of Success” and confirming (pre‑Brexit) Maintenance Regulation constraints on forum objections

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Potanina v Potanin (No. 2): Aligning the Part III Leave Threshold with a “Real Prospect of Success” and confirming (pre‑Brexit) Maintenance Regulation constraints on forum objections Introduction...
R v Sartip‑Zadeh & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 1250: Regulatory Warnings as Aggravating Factors and Fair Trial Despite Encrypted Digital Evidence

R v Sartip‑Zadeh & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 1250: Regulatory Warnings as Aggravating Factors and Fair Trial Despite Encrypted Digital Evidence

Date: Sep 6, 2025
R v Sartip‑Zadeh & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 1250: Regulatory Warnings as Aggravating Factors and Fair Trial Despite Encrypted Digital Evidence 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal...
R v Thorpe [2025] EWCA Crim 1334: Corrosive Substances (s.6 OWA 2019) Sentenced by Analogy with the Bladed/Offensive Weapons Guideline; Recall Time Not a Basis for Sentence Reduction

R v Thorpe [2025] EWCA Crim 1334: Corrosive Substances (s.6 OWA 2019) Sentenced by Analogy with the Bladed/Offensive Weapons Guideline; Recall Time Not a Basis for Sentence Reduction

Date: Sep 6, 2025
R v Thorpe [2025] EWCA Crim 1334: Corrosive Substances (s.6 OWA 2019) Sentenced by Analogy with the Bladed/Offensive Weapons Guideline; Recall Time Not a Basis for Sentence Reduction Introduction In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.