Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
S.D.N.Y.
435
Cal. Ct. App.
374
La. Ct. App.
366
Ill. App. Ct.
296
N.D. Ill.
239
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
233
Tex. App.
222
E.D. Pa.
169
U.S.T.C.
169
N.D. Cal.
159
5th Cir.
153
D.D.C.
152
D.N.J.
150
9th Cir.
147
P.T.A.B.
145
E.D. Mich.
144
N.Y. Misc.
138
D. Mass.
136
E.D.N.Y.
135
Fed. Cir.
131
D. Md.
130
2d Cir.
128
Ohio Ct. App.
128
T.C.
127
D.C. Cir.
122
D. Minn.
117
Conn. Super. Ct.
114
E.D. La.
114
S.D. Tex.
112
N.J. Super. App. Div.
109
Mich. Ct. App.
102
6th Cir.
101
7th Cir.
101
N.Y. App. Div.
101
Mo. Ct. App.
99
C.D. Cal.
98
D. Del.
92
D. Kan.
92
W.D. Wash.
92
W.D. Pa.
91
Wash. Ct. App.
91
D. Colo.
86
S.D. Fla.
84
8th Cir.
82
E.D. Cal.
82
M.D. Fla.
82
Pa. Cmmw. Ct.
79
D.S.C.
78
3d Cir.
77
4th Cir.
75
U.S.
74
Pa. Super. Ct.
73
10th Cir.
72
Fed. Cl.
70
E.D. Mo.
68
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
67
E.D. Va.
66
N.D. Ohio
64
N.D. Tex.
63
N.D.N.Y.
63
Tenn. Ct. App.
63
Del. Ch.
62
Ct. Int'l Trade
61
Minn. Ct. App.
60
Tex. Civ. App.
59
S.D.W. Va.
58
D. Ariz.
57
D.N.M.
57
S.D. Ohio
57
D. Conn.
56
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
56
M.D. Pa.
55
N.Y. Ct. Cl.
55
11th Cir.
54
D. Or.
52
Md.
51
W.D. La.
51
1st Cir.
49
E.D. Tex.
49
W.D.N.Y.
49
Mo.
46
Ind. Ct. App.
45
Mich.
44
Miss.
44
N.D. Ind.
44
Neb.
44
Wyo.
44
Del. Super. Ct.
43
Mont.
43
S.D. Ind.
43
Ga. Ct. App.
42
S.D. Cal.
42
W.D. Tex.
42
Alaska
41
D. Me.
41
Minn.
41
W.D. Ky.
40
Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
39
N.D. Ga.
39
Ala.
38
E.D. Wis.
38
N.D. Ala.
38
Mass.
37
Wash.
37
D. Alaska
36
Idaho
36
Ill.
36
N.C. Ct. App.
36
N.J. Super.
36
W.D. Wis.
36
Bankr. D. Del.
35
D. Utah
35
D.S.D.
35
Iowa
35
Pa.
35
S.D. Miss.
35
W.D. Mich.
35
W.D. Va.
35
D. Nev.
34
N.J.
34
E.D. Tenn.
33
Okla.
33
D. Neb.
32
Cal.
31
D. Haw.
30
Ind. App.
30
N.Y.
30
W.D. Mo.
30
D. Mont.
29
D. Idaho
28
D.P.R.
28
La.
28
M.D. Tenn.
27
N.D. Okla.
27
Or.
27
W.D.N.C.
27
Wis. Ct. App.
27
Kan.
26
Ky. Ct. App.
26
N.D. Iowa
26
Colo. App.
25
N.D.
25
Va.
25
W.D. Ark.
25
Conn. App. Ct.
24
N.C.
24
Or. Ct. App.
24
S.D. Ala.
24
W. Va.
24
D.N.H.
23
D.R.I.
23
S.D. Iowa
22
Tex.
22
W.D. Okla.
22
W.D. Tenn.
22
D.C.
21
Kan. Ct. App.
21
E.D. Ky.
20
E.D.N.C.
20
M.D.N.C.
20
C.C.P.A.
19
Conn.
19
Haw.
19
R.I. Super.
19
S.C.
19
Colo.
18
D.V.I.
18
Ohio
18
R.I.
18
S.D.
18
S.D. Ill.
18
Utah
18
N.D. Miss.
17
N.L.R.B-BD
17
S.D. Ga.
17
Ark.
16
D. Vt.
16
Iowa Ct. App.
16
M.D. La.
16
Me.
16
Fla.
15
M.D. Ga.
15
Miss. Ct. App.
15
N.D.W. Va.
15
T.T.A.B.
15
Bankr. D. Mass.
14
E.D. Ark.
14
Wis.
14
Ariz.
13
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
13
C.D. Ill.
13
E.D. Wash.
13
S.C. Ct. App.
13
Ark. Ct. App.
12
B.I.A.
12
D.N.D.
12
Ind.
12
Mass. Cmmw.
12
Ohio Ct. Cl.
12
Tenn. Crim. App.
12
Del.
11
Tenn.
11
Vt.
11
Ala. Civ. App.
10
Ariz. Ct. App.
10
Bankr. M.D. Fla.
10
E.D. Okla.
10
E.E.O.C.
10
M.D. Ala.
10
Mass. App. Ct.
10
Neb. Ct. App.
10
N.D. Fla.
9
N.M.
9
Ohio Misc.
9
Bankr. N.D. Ill.
8
Bankr. N.D. Tex.
8
Bankr. W.D. Tex.
8
D. Wyo.
8
Haw. Ct. App.
8
N.M. Ct. App.
8
Bankr. D. Md.
7
Bankr. D. Nev.
7
Bankr. N.D. Ohio
7
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
7
Ky.
7
Me. Super.
7
N.H.
7
Nev.
7
Ala. Crim. App.
6
B.A.P. 9th Cir.
6
Bankr. D. Colo.
6
Bankr. D. Kan.
6
Bankr. N.D.N.Y.
6
Bankr. S.D. Tex.
6
Mass. Dist. Ct. App.
6
N.C. Ind. Comn.
6
Or. T.C.
6
Utah Ct. App.
6
Bankr. N.D. Ala.
5
Bankr. N.D. Cal.
5
Bankr. S.D. Fla.
5
Bankr. W.D. Mo.
5
E.D.S.C.
5
N.J. Tax
5
N.L.R.B-ALJ
5
N.L.R.B.
5
Va. Ct. App.
5
Bankr. C.D. Cal.
4
Bankr. D. Utah
4
Bankr. D.N.J.
4
Bankr. E.D. Pa.
4
Bankr. E.D. Wis.
4
Bankr. W.D. Ky.
4
Idaho Ct. App.
4
Va. Cir. Ct.
4
Bankr. D. Mont.
3
Bankr. E.D. Tenn.
3
Bankr. S.D. Cal.
3
D. Guam
3
D.C.Z.
3
N.J. Ch.
3
Ohio Com. Pleas
3
Ark. Work Comp.
2
Bankr. D.N.D.
2
Bankr. D.N.H.
2
Bankr. D.N.M.
2
Bankr. E.D. Ky.
2
Bankr. E.D. Mo.
2
Bankr. E.D. Va.
2
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
2
Bankr. N.D. Ind.
2
Bankr. W.D. La.
2
Colo. Ind. App.
2
Ga.
2
N.C. Business
2
N.Y. Civ. Ct.
2
N.Y. Fam. Ct.
2
Okla. Civ. App.
2
Ops.Okla.Atty.Gen.
2
B.A.P. 8th Cir.
1
B.T.A.
1
Bankr. C.D. Ill.
1
Bankr. D. Alaska
1
Bankr. D. Haw.
1
Bankr. D. Idaho
1
Bankr. D. Me.
1
Bankr. D. Vt.
1
Bankr. D.S.D.
1
Bankr. E.D. Cal.
1
Bankr. E.D. La.
1
Bankr. E.D. Okla.
1
Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
1
Bankr. M.D. Ala.
1
Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
1
Bankr. N.D. Miss.
1
Bankr. S.D. Ala.
1
Bankr. S.D. Ill.
1
Bankr. S.D. Miss.
1
Bankr. W.D. Wash.
1
Bankr. W.D.N.C.
1
Cal. W.C.A.B.
1
Guam
1
N. Mar. I.
1
N.H. Super.
1
N.Y. Crim. Ct.
1
N.Y. Just. Ct.
1
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.
1
Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.
1
Tex. Crim. App.
1
Vt. Super. Ct. Civ. Div.
1
Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div.
1
W.D.S.C.
1
Alaska Ct. App.
0
App. T. 1st Dep't
0
App. T. 2d Dep't
0
Ariz. Tax Ct.
0
Ark. Workers' Comp. Comm'n
0
B.A.P. 10th Cir.
0
B.A.P. 1st Cir.
0
B.A.P. 2nd Cir.
0
B.A.P. 6th Cir.
0
Bankr. D. Ariz.
0
Bankr. D. Conn.
0
Bankr. D. Guam
0
Bankr. D. Minn.
0
Bankr. D. Neb.
0
Bankr. D. Or.
0
Bankr. D. Wyo.
0
Bankr. D.D.C.
0
Bankr. D.P.R.
0
Bankr. D.R.I.
0
Bankr. D.S.C.
0
Bankr. D.V.I.
0
Bankr. E.D. Ark.
0
Bankr. E.D. Tex.
0
Bankr. E.D. Wash.
0
Bankr. E.D.N.C.
0
Bankr. M.D. Ga.
0
Bankr. M.D. La.
0
Bankr. M.D. Pa.
0
Bankr. M.D.N.C.
0
Bankr. N.D. Fla.
0
Bankr. N.D. Iowa
0
Bankr. N.D. Okla.
0
Bankr. N.D.W. Va.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ga.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ind.
0
Bankr. S.D. Iowa
0
Bankr. S.D. Ohio
0
Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
0
Bankr. W.D. Ark.
0
Bankr. W.D. Mich.
0
Bankr. W.D. Okla.
0
Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
0
Bankr. W.D. Va.
0
Bankr. W.D. Wis.
0
Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
0
Cal. Super.
0
Conn. C.P.
0
Conn. Cir. Ct.
0
Conn. Work Comp.
0
D. Ind.
0
D.N. Mar. I.
0
D.R.I. (Bankr.)
0
Del. Com. Pleas
0
Del. Fam.
0
Del. Gen. Sess.
0
Del. J.P. Ct.
0
Del. Jud.
0
Del. Orph.
0
E.D. Ill.
0
Emer. Ct. App.
0
F.T.C.
0
FISA Ct.
0
Ind. T.C.
0
J.P.M.L.
0
M.D. Mich.
0
Mass. DIA
0
Mass. Super.
0
Mont. T.A.B.
0
N. Mar. I. Commw. Super. Ct.
0
N.C. Cir.
0
N.C. Super.
0
N.D. Ct. App.
0
N.J. Cir. Ct.
0
N.L.R.B-UBD
0
N.Y. App. Term
0
N.Y. City Ct.
0
N.Y. Cnty. Ct.
0
N.Y. County Ct.
0
N.Y. Dist. Ct.
0
N.Y. Sup. Ct. Com. Div.
0
N.Y. Surr. Ct.
0
Nev. App.
0
Okla. Crim. App.
0
Okla. Ind. Review
0
Okla. Jud. Eth.
0
Ops. Fla. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. La. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. N.Y. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. Tex. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. Wash. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Colo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Mo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Neb.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen.
0
PTAB
0
Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc.
0
S.D. W. Va.
0
Tenn. Ch.
0
Tenn. Cir.
0
Tex. J.P.M.L.
0
U.S.C.M.C.R.
0
Vet App.
0
W. Va. Int. Ct. App.
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
1940
From 2011 To 2020
3178
From 2001 To 2010
1869
From 1991 To 2000
1056
From 1981 To 1990
1030
From 1971 To 1980
724
From 1961 To 1970
608
From 1951 To 1960
361
Before 1950
630

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

1

... WEATHER ENGINEERING CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND WEATHER ENGINEERING CORPORATION OF CANADA, LTD. v. THE UNITED STATES. No. 343-72...Jacques d'Avignon and Bernard A. Power, and has, throughout its term, been owned by the Weather Engineering Corporation of Canada, Ltd.... The other co-plaintiff, Weather Engineering Corporation of America, is an alleged exclusive licensee for all parts of the world except Canada. Defendant...


Court:
Date: Jan 23, 1980 Cited By: 9 Coram: 1
2

...Corp. ("Multidata"), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri, and three Canadian corporations, MDS Inc. ("MDS"), MDS (Canada) Inc. ("MDS Canada"), and MDS... occurred in Canada, and Canadian law governed the dispute. Id. at 1080. Finally, in an analogous situation involving a domestic Delaware corporation, this...CORP.; MDS Nordion, Inc.; MDS Canada, Inc.; MDS, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-41232. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit...


Court:
Date: Apr 7, 2008 Cited By: 644 Coram: 1
3

...located in either Canada or Australia. Such pertinent information as plane maintenance records, weather information, and crash...investigations is located in Canada. In short, Pennsylvania's only connection with the litigation is the fact that defendant Hanlon Wilson is a Pennsylvania corporation... GRAEME MacARTHUR LACEY, APPELLANT, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, A CORPORATION; HANLON WILSON COMPANY, A CORPORATION; TELEDYNE INC., A CORPORATION; AND JOHN DOES 1 — 10...


Court:
Date: Nov 21, 1988 Cited By: 253 Coram: 1
4

...decks are fitted with the usual glass covers and the usual iron shutters, and have no cargo stowed against them, is not unseaworthy by reason of beginning a voyage in fair weather with the glass.... This was a libel in admiralty, filed June 14, 1894, in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, by the Franklin Sugar Refining Company, a corporation organized...five eighths of an inch thick, set in a brass frame, as well as with an inner cover or dummy of iron. When the ship sailed, the weather was fair, and the glass covers were tightly closed, but the...


Court:
Date: Oct 17, 1898 Cited By: 144 Coram: 1
5

... HYDRAULIC PRESS MFG. CO. v. LAKE ERIE ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al. No. 46. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.... Action in equity by the Hydraulic Press Manufacturing Company against the Lake Erie Engineering Corporation and Hans Illing to enjoin first named defendant from employing the last named...), for appellee-defendant Lake Erie Engineering Corporation. Rann, Brown, Sturtevant Kelly, of Buffalo, N.Y., and Toulmin Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio (Howard R. Sturtevant, of Buffalo...


Court:
Date: Dec 30, 1942 Cited By: 3 Coram: 1
6

...(Cust. Pat.App. 1979), see Weather Engineering Corp. of America v. United States, 614 F.2d 281... STRATOFLEX, INC., APPELLEE, v. AEROQUIP CORPORATION, APPELLANT. Appeal No. 83-587. United States Court of Appeals...Aeroquip was therefore not entitled to the presumption's full benefit; that the relevant prior art included rubber hose; that one of ordinary skill in the art had a degree in chemical engineering or...


Court:
Date: Jul 25, 1983 Cited By: 492 Coram: 1
7

...as defendants Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., Medical Engineering Corporation, Aesthetech Corporation, and Natural Y Surgical Specialties, Inc., all of whom had some...."); Barron v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd., 965 F.2d 195, 198 (7th Cir. 1992) ("Even in diversity cases the rules of evidence applied in federal courts are the federal rules of evidence rather...


Court:
Date: Apr 13, 2005 Cited By: 278 Coram: 2
8

...which covered West 96th Street had allegedly formed after Delma Engineering Corporation, a defendant, discharged water onto the roadway in subfreezing weather during the course of work for the New... RACHEL BALSAM et al., Respondents, v. DELMA ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Respondent, and EXXON CORPORATION et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants...; Kelley Drye Warren, attorneys), for Exxon Corporation, appellant. Jeremy Heisler of counsel (Kevin B. Pollak with him on the brief; Killarney Rein Brody...


Court:
Date: Aug 4, 1988 Cited By: 221 Coram: 1
9

... MARK T. ADDLESPURGER, an individual, DENISE L. PALMER, an individual, and ENGINEERING DYNAMICS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER..., v. E-ONE MOLI ENERGY (CANADA) LTD., a foreign corporation, Additional Defendant. MOTORIST INSURANCE COMPANIES, as Subrogee of MARK T. ADDLESPURGER and DENISE L. PALMER, Plaintiffs, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER...CORPORATION, Defendant, v. SONY CORPORATION, a foreign corporation and COMPUSA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Additional Defendants, v. E-ONE MOLI ENERGY (CANADA) LTD., a foreign corporation...


Court:
Date: Jun 22, 2007 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
10

...on a shuttle flight from Johnny Mountain to Wrangell, on either a fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter, depending on the weather. Canada West Air flew miners from Wrangell to Vancouver and back again on a...Mountain Mine, a gold mine, in British Columbia to an airport in Wrangell, Alaska. At the airport, the passengers, all mine employees, planned to transfer to a waiting plane, owned and operated by Canada...West Air, and continue on to Vancouver, British Columbia. Skyline Gold Corporation, the employer, paid for and arranged the flights with two separate charter services. Northern Mountain flew miners...


Court:
Date: Apr 21, 1995 Cited By: 214 Coram: 1
11

... LANSFORD-COALDALE JOINT WATER AUTHORITY, APPELLANT IN No. 92-7605 v. TONOLLI CORPORATION; TONOLLI CANADA, LTD.; IFIM INTERNATIONAL B.V., APPELLANTS IN No. 92-7671...was or would be any contamination of its wells. Based on this study, the Authority brought suit against Tonolli PA, its sister corporation, Tonolli Canada, and its parent corporation, IFIM, alleging...court for further consideration. I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Tonolli Canada is a Canadian Corporation engaged...


Court:
Date: Sep 17, 1993 Cited By: 124 Coram: 1
12

...preliminary objections of SW and dismissed the lawsuit filed against SW by plaintiff-appellee Pullman Power Products of Canada Limited ("Pullman"). SW is a Canadian Corporation (Ontario...) whose head office and principal place of business is located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and is engaged in, inter alia, the business on engineering and designing piping systems, including pipe...hangers and pipe supplies for power plants. SW does not maintain any offices or facilities in Pennsylvania. Pullman is a Canadian corporation (Province of Ontario, Canada) and is...


Court:
Date: Jun 30, 1998 Cited By: 12 Coram: 1
13

...Manufacturing Company and/or Panacon Corporation, Combustion Engineering, Inc.; Dixon Ticonderoga Company, and its division New Castle Refractories Co.; Dresser Industries, Inc., and its division...Keasby Mattison Co.; North American Refractories Company; Oglebay Norton Company, and its division, Ferro Engineering; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pennsylvania Glass Sand.... Green Refractories Company, Allegheny Sand, Inc., Allied Glove Corporation; Armstrong World Industries, Inc., in its own right and as successor-in-interest to Armstrong Cork Company and Armstrong...


Court:
Date: Oct 18, 1995 Cited By: 280
14

...properly ordered extradited from the United States to Canada to face charges of conspiring to commit a murder and of procuring a murder. We hold that he was. Appellant Vincenzo Melia...issued pursuant to a formal request by Canada to the United States that Melia be extradited under the Treaty on Extradition between the United States and Canada, 27 U.S.T. 983, as amended March 22.... In the past, with respect to certain other offenses, extradition from Canada to the United States has encountered thorny...


Court:
Date: Dec 16, 1981 Cited By: 59 Coram: 1
15

..., we affirm. Background OMS is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business in Canada. Command-Aire...the possible purchase of heat pump equipment manufactured by Command-Aire. During the period of negotiation preceding the actual sale, Barbesin traveled to Texas to deliver and discuss engineering...the sale. All in-person negotiations for the contract occurred outside of Canada and the parties agreed that Texas law would control the sales contract. In this setting we cannot discount, as we did...


Court:
Date: Jun 18, 1992 Cited By: 210 Coram: 1
16

...indicates that an agency relationship existed between Cajun and S W. For example, the power of attorney executed by Cajun appoints Stone Webster Engineering Corporation "to act for it in its name, place...Engineering Corporation "to act for it in its name, place and stead, for the purpose and rental of tangible personal property with funds contributed (sic) by principal. . . ." Additionally, the purchase.... Robert R. Rainer, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellants Cajun Elec. Power Coop. Inc. and Stone Webster Engineering Corp...


Court:
Date: Oct 12, 1984 Cited By: 61 Coram: 1
17

.... Defendants Cadbury plc, Cadbury Holdings, Mars Canada, Nestlé S.A., and Nestlé Canada have also filed motions to dismiss (Docs. 466, 471, 473, 474) under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of in personam.... The Rule 12(b)(6) motions filed by Cadbury plc, Cadbury Holdings, Mars Canada, Nestlé S.A. and Nestlé Canada will be deferred until resolution of their jurisdictional challenges...¶ 19; Doc. 420 ¶ 80; Doc. 448 ¶ 31.) Defendant Hershey Canada, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hershey Global, distributes Hershey products in Canada. (Doc. 418 ¶ 20; Doc. 420 ¶ 50; Doc. 448 ¶ 28...


Court:
Date: Mar 4, 2009 Cited By: 145 Coram: 1
18

... CUSTOM MANUFACTURING AND ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDWAY SERVICES, INC., Automated Engineering Corporation, MDCO, Inc., NTU Electronics, Inc., et al...reading system to be installed in residential complexes, but Midway had cancelled the contract (on the ground that Custom had breached it) and hired Automated Engineering Corporation ("AEC"), MDCO, Inc...of a contract action between Custom Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. ("Custom") and Midway Services, Inc. ("Midway") in Florida state court. Custom had agreed to design for Midway a water meter...


Court:
Date: Nov 21, 2007 Cited By: 215 Coram: 1
19

..., 1963 to the date of completion, the State would require engineering charges to be deducted from moneys due under the contract. On January 27, 1964 Erecto Corporation again requested an extension, this...time on the ground of bad weather conditions. The request was granted, and the provision for deduction of engineering charges was continued on the ground that the contractor had not taken advantage of.... This check was returned by Erecto Corporation which thereafter filed its claim on December 16, 1964. The right of the State to deduct engineering charges from the final moneys due the contractor is...


Court:
Date: Jan 22, 1968 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
20

...Defendant-Appellee. Karen M. Asner and Milana Salzman, White Case LLP, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae the Government of Canada in Support of Dismissal of the Underlying Action...Affirmance. James J. Dillon, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA, Janet Walker, Professor of Law, Osgood Hall Law School of York University. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and H. Scott Fairley..., Theall Group LLP, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, for Amici Curiae the Canadian Chamber of Commerce; the Mining Association of Canada; the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers; and the Prospectors...


Court:
Date: Oct 2, 2009 Cited By: 306 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).