Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.
There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).
...."3. We were referred by the parties to the following authorities:- Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No.2) [1991] IRLR 286.Quinn & Others v...
...enforceable at the suit of the individual employee. See Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No.2) [1991] IRLR 286.Accordingly the Tribunal were entitled...
...not apply. Mr Linden has referred us to the case of Alexander and others (plaintiffs) v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (defendants) (No. 2), Wall and others (plaintiffs) v...Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (defendants) (No. 2) [1990) IRLR 55. The principle on which Mr Linden relies is well set out in the head note where it is stated as...
...agreement or the process of litigation: see such cases as Tomlin v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd [1969] 1 WLR 1378. The...
...Tomlin v. Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd. (1969) 1 W.L.R. 1378 per Ormrod J. at p. 1385). Now, it is certainly the case - and the contrary...
...was, in Alexander v Standard Telephones and Cables [1991] IRLR 286, and in paragraph 16 it seems to us they appropriately applied those...
...(1889) 23 QBD 335 and which was applied in Tomalin -v- Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd [[1969] 1 WLR 1378. The court will not permit the phrase to be used to exclude...
...adopted towards the problem. 13. The first case was Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd. [1991] IRLR 286...
...considered the authorities cited to her, particularly Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd [1991] IRLR 286, at paragraph 12:"Having taken these...
...trade union and employers is not automatically incorporated into employees' contracts of employment: Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd ( No 2.... 31. Mr Gardiner referred to the following authorities: Alexander v Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd (No. 2) [1991] IRLR 286, Sabah Flour and...
...our attention. The first is the decision of Hobhouse J (as he then was) in Alexander and Others v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd [1991] IRLR 286. In that...
...Tomlin v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd [1969] 1 WLR 1378, 1384. But where the letters are not headed "without prejudice" unnecessarily or meaninglessly, as he went on...
...v. Wilsher (1889) 23 Q.B.D. 335 and which was applied inTomlin v. Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd. [1969] 1 W.L.R...
...inCaswell v. Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd. [1940] A.C. 152. and bythe Master of the Rolls in Stimpson v. Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd...
...contractual term: Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No.2) [1991] IRLR 286 at §31. A non- exhaustive list of factors that are relevant to determining whether a provision is apt...telephone or mobile telephones, and any other monies due to the Company during the course of your employment. Where you have entered into a training agreement with the Company, any outstanding costs...
...enforceable in itself, but it may have a normative effect on the individual contract of employment: see Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No. 2) [1991...
...point, of course, is the language of the employment documents as a whole (I avoid the term employment contract at this stage.) As Hobhouse J said in Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No 2...
...Walker v. Wilsher (1889) 23 Q.B.D. 335 and which was applied in Tomlin v. Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd. [1969] 1 W.L.R...Tomlin v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd [1969] 1 WLR 1378, 1384. But where the letters are not headed 'without prejudice' unnecessarily or meaninglessly, as he...
...contracts of personal service and, when they are so incorporated, they are enforceable” 26. In Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No 2) [1991] IRLR 286...
...Telephones & Cables (No 2) [1991] IRLR 286). 135. Accordingly, I agree with Mr Sutton that the provision provides the Trust with a discretion to suspend Dr...