Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court15737
+ Bombay High Court2352
+ SEBI1881
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1710
+ Kerala High Court1517
+ Delhi High Court1344
+ Karnataka High Court1340
+ Supreme Court Of India987
+ Allahabad High Court976
+ Telangana High Court953
+ Gujarat High Court913
+ Central Administrative Tribunal835
+ Patna High Court769
+ Calcutta High Court719
+ National Green Tribunal647
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court613
+ Gauhati High Court572
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court546
+ Rajasthan High Court495
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal325
+ CESTAT262
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court258
+ Orissa High Court209
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court189
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal162
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity159
+ Jharkhand High Court149
+ Chhattisgarh High Court138
+ Uttarakhand High Court138
+ National Company Law Tribunal125
+ Central Information Commission114
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission79
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal75
+ Tripura High Court72
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal70
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal56
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission53
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission51
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal44
+ Company Law Board38
+ Armed Forces Tribunal32
+ Manipur High Court31
+ Meghalaya High Court23
+ Sikkim High Court23
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board22
+ Privy Council21
+ Competition Commission Of India20
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission17
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal8
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India4
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property4
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India4
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission4
+ District Court3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings2
+ RERA2
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards17381
From 2011 To 202011323
From 2001 To 20103307
From 1991 To 20001208
From 1981 To 1990738
From 1971 To 1980430
From 1961 To 1970418
From 1951 To 1960360
Before 1950129

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Kuchera, District Nagaur for offences under Sections 66E & 67A of the I.T. Act and Section 6/7 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act. Police after...investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter against petitioner and another accused person. It is argued by learned counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter.... Learned counsel has further submitted that in fact his mobile phone was used by main accused Sharif Khan and he was responsible for sending indecent photographs on WhatsApp group using that mobile...

...registered against two persons for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. After that another representation was...12.05.2023 and 09.08.2023 within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. Page 1 of 4 For...filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 12.05.2023 and 09.08.2023 within a reasonable time as may be...

...representation against the proposed action. In support of his contention he relied on a judgment of this Court in Goka Bujjamma v. Prohibition and Excise S...petitions have been filed questioning the said suspension orders passed by the 1st respondent-Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise and to declare the said orders as illegal, against the principles of...1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleaders for Prohibition and Excise; and Home appearing for the respondents. 2...

..., who had preferred a false complaint against him under Section 14 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Work Place (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 and not to allow pensionary benefits to them....against him. The petitioner has also given a representation dated 15.10.2023 to the respondents 1 and 2 and all the authorities concerned to take necessary disciplinary action against all those teachers...respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner and initiate action against the complainants. Hence, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 14. In...

...reached the Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu (Prohibition and Excise Department) on 5-2-1998. The Minister concerned rejected the representation on 14-2-1998. According to the learned counsel, the...the affidavit sworn to by Shri R. Poornalingam, IAS, Secretary to the Government, (Prohibition and Excise Department) in answer to the contentions of the appellant in the special leave petition, the...file was considered by the Deputy Secretary who in turn sent the same to the Minister for Law for approval. The representation was considered and rejected by the Minister for Law on 14-2-1998 as he was...

...requires that the agreement shall be in a certain form, no contract may result from the representation and acting thereafter, but the law is not powerless to raise in appropriate cases an equity against...facts and promises made by them, relying on which other persons have altered their position to their prejudice. The obligation arising against an individual out of his representation amounting to a...merits any representation of a tax-payer for exemption from payment of octroi, and if any such representation was made by the factories situate in the Industrial Area, the Council would consider the same...

...been registered against you under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and in which you have been arrested.Sr. No. Police Stn. CR No...representation against the order of detention and it infringed the constitutional safeguard provided under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India. In the instant case, the grounds of detention are...Pending 2. Navrangpura 114/88 Prohibition Act — Sections 66(b), 65(a)(e), 116(b) and 98 139750 Mltr foreign liquor Pending...

.... 1469 of 2016, dated 23.12.2016, has held that non-furnishing of the vernacular version of a bail order copy would prejudice the detenu in making an effective representation against the order of detention and on that groun...prevented from making an effective representation against the impugned order of detention.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further contended that the detaining authority failed to ask...petitioner herein, through Short Message Service (SMS).6. This Court, in Saroja v. Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Chennai, in H.C.P. No...

...communicate to such person the grounds on which the order of detention has been made and (2) to afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order.8...detenu. Failure to do so would amount to denial of the right of being communicated the grounds and of being afforded the opportunity of making a representation against the order. (See...activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public health and public order. He referred to four cases filed under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 in which she was found guilty and was...

...lodged against the applicant and one another on 26.03.2023 and according to the FIR, in the absence of husband of the informant, applicant has taken indecent photographs of his wife while she was...Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, Police Station- Mauaima, District- Prayagraj, during pendency of the trial in the court below. 3. FIR of the present case was...allegation made against the applicant is totally false and baseless and FIR of the present case was lodged after about more than a year from the date of alleged taking of indecent photographs of the...

...Jarinabegam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu by Secretary to Government, Prohibition and Exercise Department, Chennai and another (2007-1-MLJ-Crl-18) relying up...the detenu coming out on bail, which has affected the constitutional right of making an effective and purposeful representation to the authorities concerned, thereby vitiating the detention...M.Ahamed Kutty Vs. Union of India and another (1990-2-SCC-1) has observed thus:- 7. Considering the facts in the instant case, the...

...No. 1052 of 2017 of Chittar Police Station, Pathanamthitta. The above case is registered against the petitioner and another alleging offence punishable under Section 67 of the Information Technology...Act and under Section 4 r/w Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Prohibition Act, 1986. 3. The prosecution case is that some photographs of the defacto complainant were sent...from the mobile phone of the petitioner to the first accused who is a minor and it is further alleged that the first accused morphed the said photographs and transmitted the same in the social media...

...offence under the Dowry Prohibition Act and thus the charges levelled against the appellants under Sections 3/4 of the said Act, are not liable to be quashed.31. In view of...Krishna Murari, J.— Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 24-11-2016 2016 SCC OnLine All...charge-sheet filed against them. The High Court while rejecting Section 482 CrPC petition directed the appellant-accused to surrender before the court concerned within 30 days from the date of order and...

...the alleged criminal activities of the detenu has rendered the order illegal and bad as the petitioner was prevented from making an effective representation against the same...or through other person the English and Deshi liquor of Dariapur area; in this connection the offences under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 are registered against you, wherein you were arrested, the...knife and whom he has alleged to have beaten. These vague averments made in the grounds of detention hereinbefore are bad inasmuch as the detenu could not make an effective representation against the...

.... Ext. P2(4) is another representation submitted by him before the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Kerala and Ext. P3 is a letter submitted by Sri. Kuniyil Krishnan to die District Collector providing the...participated in the Quit India Movement from 21-9-1942 to 31-3-1946.4. He has also stated that he was constrained to go underground since warrant of arrest against him and 12 others...the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Thalassery stating that the records prior to the year 1960 have already been destroyed and that it is not possible to verify whether a case was charged against Sri. K.M...

...and “shall afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order”. This clause does not specify as to whom the representation is to be made and how the representation is...to the State Government and the Central Government against the order of detention, the detenu has a further right to make a representation to the officer himself who has made the order of detention...accordingly been held further that it is to that Government that the detenu should be afforded opportunity to make representation against the detention order at the earliest opportunity, and not to the...

...criminal cases under the Prohibition Act even if taken to be existing against the appellant, they do not involve a question of any breach of public order and on the basis of these cases, at the most...1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgement and order dated 13.4.2000, whereby the petitioner's Special Civil Application was dismissed against the detention order...annexed with the detention order show that on the date of passing of the detention order, six criminal cases dated 18.3.1998, 22.9.1998, 8.10.1998, 12.1.1999, 21.5.1999 and 10.7.1999, were pending against...

...benami, the subsequent legislation, namely, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, has put a complete bar to the plaintiff's suit against the defendant in respect of the suit house...legislation, namely, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 and its predecessor Ordinance. In other words, whether the effectuation of the decree has been barred. For this it is relevant to note...property is held is a trustee or other person standing in a fiduciary capacity, and the property is held for the benefit of another person for whom he is a trustee or towards whom he stands in such capacity...

...AR. Lakshmanan, J. (for V.N Khare, C.J and himself)— These three appeals are directed against the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in...Letter No. SUC1091/197.Revised/1-1-96/13-A dated 30-7-1999 for carrying out provisions of Sections 58-A and 114 of the Prohibition Act and carrying out an executive function under Article 162 of the...Constitution and/or a lawful order under the Act, falling under Sections 58-A and 114 of the Prohibition Act or Rule 17(43) of the Rules of 1966 and Rule 6(36) of the Rules of 1973...

...was held to found a cause of action against the Government, even when, and this needs to be emphasised, the representation sought to be enforced was legally invalid in the sense that it was made in a...or representation made by it, the Court would not raise an equity in favour of the person to whom the promise or representation is made and enforce the promise or representation against the...acted on the representation made and could not be asked to pay the purchase tax w.e.f 1-4-1996 but would be liable after the decision of the Government for the subsequent period i.e from 4-6-1997...