Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Camden Foley v. Session Corp.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CAMDEN FOLEY and SAMUEL

BERTAIN,

Plaintiffs Below,

Appellants,

v.

SESSION CORP., ESTHER

LENOIR RAMIREZ, and VINH

PHO,

Defendants Below,

Appellees.

§

§ No. 459, 2025

§

§ Court Below–Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. 2023-0186

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: May 20, 2026

Decided: June 3, 2026

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

This 3rd day of June 2026, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and

the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the judgment

of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated

in its Post-Trial Opinion dated September 9, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Chief Justice

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Camden Foley v. Session Corp.
(Jun 3, 2026)