Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Potillo v. Murrill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

MAURICE ANTHONY POTILLO (#747521) CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS 24-551-SDD-RLB

ELIZABETH MURRILL, ETAL

RULING

The Court has carefully considered the record, the law applicable to this action,

and the Report and Recommendations1 of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L.

Bourgeois, Jr. dated March 16, 2026, to which no objection was filed.

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate

Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of

Habeas Corpus By A Person in State Custody, filed by Maurice Potillo, is DENIED as

unexhausted and that this proceeding is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Potillo seeks to appeal a decision dismissing

his claims, a certificate ofappealability be DENIED.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana the _/_ day of April, 2026.

^AJ^Ai^^ CHIEF JUDGE^ELLY D. DICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Rec. Doc. 13.

Case 3:24-cv-00551-SDD-SDJ Document 14 04/02/26 Page 1 of 1

    1. Superintendent of Documents
    2. 2026-04-03T19:26:28-0400
    3. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
    4. U.S. Government Publishing Office
    5. Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Potillo v. Murrill
(Apr 2, 2026)