Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

Holland v. CryptoZoo, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

DON HOLLAND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

v.

CRYPTOZOO INC., a Delaware

Corporation; LOGAN PAUL;

DANIELLE STROBEL; JEFFREY

LEVIN; EDUARDO IBANEZ; JAKE

GREENBAUM a/k/a CRYPTO KING; and OPHIR BENTOV a/k/a BEN

ROTH;

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 1:23-CV-00110-ADA-RCG

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Derek Griffin (Dkt. 107) regarding Defendant Logan Paul's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 85). The report recommends that Defendant Paul's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. The report was filed on August 14, 2025.

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). A district court need not consider "[f]rivolous, conclusive, or general objections." Battle v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987) (quoting Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 n.8 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), overruled on other grounds by

1

Douglass v. United States Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996)). Defendant Logan Paul filed objections on August 28, 2025 (Dkt. 112). Additionally, Defendant Logan Paul filed Supplemental Authority to those Objections on October 24, 2025 (Dkt. 116). The Court has conducted de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, the objections to the report and recommendation, and the applicable laws. After that thorough review, the Court is persuaded that the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted in their entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Griffin (Dkt. 107) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Logan Paul's objections are

OVERRULED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Logan Paul's Motion to Dismiss is hereby

GRANTED as to all Counts and all 27 of Plaintiffs' claims be DISMISSED. As to Counts 1-26, Plaintiffs are GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND. As to Count 27, Plaintiffs' claim is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SIGNED this 29th day of October, 2025.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Holland v. CryptoZoo, Inc.
(Oct 29, 2025)