Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

United States v. Robles-Santiago

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, vs. RAYMUNDO ROBLES-SANTIAGO,

Defendant.

8:25CR125

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial

Motion Deadline. (Filing No. 18). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause

shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline, (Filing No.

18), is granted.

2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 3, 2025.

3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of

justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and September

3, 2025, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the

requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account

the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. The

failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this

court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 1st day of July, 2025.

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:25-cr-00125-BCB-MDN Doc # 19 Filed: 07/01/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # <pageID>

    1. Superintendent of Documents
    2. 2025-07-02T17:19:19-0400
    3. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
    4. U.S. Government Publishing Office
    5. Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Robles-Santiago
(Jul 1, 2025)