PER CURIAM.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
Submitted on Appellees' Motion for Summary Affirmance Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 September 12, 2024
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-23-cv-02741) District Judge: Honorable Juan R. Sánchez
Before: Jordan, Porter, and Phipps, Circuit Judges
OPINION [*]
PER CURIAM.
Appellees' motion for summary affirmance is granted, and we will summarily affirm the District Court's order dismissing William Kaetz's complaint. The reasons for our ruling are explained by separate opinion issued in Kaetz v. United States, C. A. No. 23-2322. Kaetz's motion to withdraw the motion for judicial notice that he filed at Appeal Docket No. 18 is granted. Kaetz's corrected motion for judicial notice is granted to the extent that we have considered the arguments raised therein in resolving this appeal. To the extent that any of Kaetz's submissions on appeal can be construed to request any other relief, such relief is denied.
[*] This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.