Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

GARY V. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants.

CARL J. NICHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

CARL J. NICHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In case number 24-cv-334, pro se plaintiff Gary Jenkins filed an incoherent complaint against a multitude of defendants, ranging from a linen supply company to Donald Trump. The Court dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Jenkins' complaint was “patently insubstantial.” Jenkins v. Williams, 24-cv-334, ECF No. 19 at 2. The complaint in this case is essentially a carbon copy of that one.It therefore meets the same end for the same reasons.

Although he has only attempted to serve one defendant this time (Donald Trump), the complaint appears to intend to name all the same defendants as last time. See ECF No. 1.

It is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The Clerk is directed to terminate this case.

This is a final appealable order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Jenkins v. Trump
(Aug 1, 2024)