Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD ALAN SISNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

D.C. No. 4:22-CR-00190-JFH-1 (N.D. Okla.)

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

This matter is before the court on the parties' Joint Motion to Remand for Resentencing, in which they request that the court remand this appeal to the district court for resentencing. Upon consideration and review of the record, the court:

A. Grants the motion;

B. Remands this case to the district court for resentencing and to undertake, in its discretion, all necessary and appropriate proceedings required to resentence defendant-appellant Richard Alan Sisney in accord with the Joint Motion to Remand for Resentencing filed here; and

C. Directs the Clerk to issue the mandate forthwith.

Because this matter is being decided on a Joint Motion to Remand for Resentencing this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of the appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Sisney
(Apr 1, 2024)