Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARCELLUS JAMES FENNELL, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 28, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:08-cr-00077-D-1)

Marcellus James Fennell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Marcellus James Fennell, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a sentence reduction. See Concepcion v. United States, 142 S.Ct. 2389, 2404-05 (2022) (explaining standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Fennell, No. 7:08-cr-00077-D-1 (E.D. N.C. Apr. 16, 2020).[*]We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

[*] This appeal was held in abeyance for United States v. Stokes, No. 20-6021, 2023 WL 5014095 (4th Cir. Aug. 7, 2023).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Fennell
(Oct 2, 2023)