Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

DAWN M. WHITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant.

R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 4, 2022, the Magistrate Judge recommended that this case be dismissed as (1) Patrick J. White cannot proceed pro se to assert a claim on behalf of Dawn M. White, and (2) Mrs. White's claims are time barred under Ala. Code § 6-5-482. (Doc. 30.) On October 13, 2022, the Plaintiffs filed Objections (Doc. 31) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 30). The Court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Upon this Court's review and consideration of the arguments set forth in the Objections, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's findings and analysis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Objections (Doc. 31) are OVERRULED.
2. The Recommendation (Doc. 30) is ADOPTED.
3. The Government's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED as to all claims asserted by the Plaintiffs.
4. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

White v. United States
(Oct 20, 2022)