Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERRANCE TRAYNHAM, Defendant.

Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the court on Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [100]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 28, 2022.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [100] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 28, 2022.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between April 29, 2022, and June 28, 2022, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

BY THE COURT:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Traynham
(May 2, 2022)