Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Harlan D. DOUGLASS, et ux., Respondents, v. Bryan J. REILLY, Petitioner.

ORDER

¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Stephens and Justices Johnson, Owens, Gordon McCloud, and Montoya-Lewis, considered at its December 1, 2020, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondents' "Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions" and request for attorney fees are also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Stephens, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Douglass v. Reilly
(Dec 2, 2020)