Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

In re: JOHN FARELIN HILL, Petitioner.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:20-cv-00404) Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Farelin Hill, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Farelin Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court took significant action on Hill's § 2241 petition in January 2021. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Hill
(Jul 1, 2021)