Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

MARTIN BAACK AND BRENDA BAACK v. MICHAEL MCINTOSH, ET AL.

VAN H. KYZAR JUDGE

APPEAL FROM THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, NO. 87,843 A
HONORABLE DESIREE DUHON DYESS, DISTRICT JUDGE Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Van H. Kyzar, and Jonathan W. Perry, Judges.

REVERSED.

Dorwan G. Vizzier
Broussard, Halcomb & Vizzier
P. O. Box 11875
Alexandria, LA 71315
(318) 487-4589
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS:






Martin Baack, Individually and on Behalf of Estate of Allissah Baack

Brenda Baack, Individually and on Behalf of Estate of Allissah Baack Jack E. Truitt
The Truitt Law Firm
149 North New Hampshire Street
Covington, LA 70433
(985) 327-5266
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE:






Zurich American Insurance Company KYZAR, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Martin and Brenda Baack, individually and on behalf of their minor child, Allissah Baack, appeal from a trial court judgment assessing them with $15,606.05 in court costs after a jury verdict found that an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Zurich American Insurance Company, did not provide uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage for injuries Mr. Baack suffered in an automobile accident. For the reasons stated this day in Baack v. McIntosh, 19-657 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/___/20), ___ So.3d ___, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

REVERSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Baack v. McIntosh
(Jul 29, 2020)