Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

Henrietta HART, for Use and Benefit of Joseph DANZANSKY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gertrude W. FINLEY et al., Defendants.

          WILKIN, District Judge.

         The complaint alleges breach of contract and misrepresentations. The defendant trustees were made parties because they hold the legal title to the property. The trustees are not charged with misrepresentation or breach of contract, and there is no allegation of threatened foreclosure of the deed of trust. There is, therefore, no basis for any relief against the trustees.

         But because legal title to the property is in the trustees and because this action involves the contract which led to the transfer of the property, it seems to this Court that the trustees are proper parties. If the trustees had not been made parties and they had filed a motion to intervene, the Court certainly would have sustained such a motion. If further pleadings and proceedings warrant such action, the trustees may renew their motion to be dismissed. For the time being, however, the motion of defendant trustees to dismiss the complaint as to them is overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hart v. Finley
(Aug 13, 1955)