Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. S. WILKES, Medical Staff Super

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:16-cv-00835-RBH) Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Curtis Richardson appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Richardson's motion for default judgment for $5,000 rather than $10,000 as alleged in Richardson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Wilkes, No. 4:16-cv-00835-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2018 & Mar. 23, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Richardson v. Wilkes
(Aug 20, 2018)