AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Micah UMEH, Defendant–Appellant, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., etc., et al., Defendants.

Micah Umeh, appellant pro se.

Leopold & Associates, PLLC, Armonk (Richard P. O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on or about September 22, 2015, which denied the motion of defendant Micah Umeh to dismiss the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Once defendant placed plaintiff's standing into issue, it was plaintiff's burden to establish its standing by showing physical possession of the note prior to commencement of the action (see Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Taylor, 25 N.Y.3d 355, 361, 12 N.Y.S.3d 612, 34 N.E.3d 363 [2015] ). Here, plaintiff attached the note, which was annexed to the certificate of merit, to its complaint. While the averments in the certificate of merit were insufficient to establish delivery and possession, the fact that the note was in plaintiff's possession at the time of commencement, as evidenced by its attachment to the complaint, was sufficient (see Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. Catizone, 127 A.D.3d 1151, 9 N.Y.S.3d 315 [2nd Dept.2015] ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Umeh
(Dec 8, 2016)