AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Patrick MILLER, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (John Gemmill of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Katherine C. Reilly of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered April 26, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claims that the Supreme Court erred in excusing potential jurors based on their personal hardship and deprived him of his right to a public trial are unpreserved for appellate review ( seeCPL 470.05[2]; People v. George, 79 A.D.3d 1148, 913 N.Y.S.2d 569; People v. Casanova, 62 A.D.3d 88, 92, 875 N.Y.S.2d 31; People v. Toussaint, 40 A.D.3d 1017, 1017–1018, 837 N.Y.S.2d 218; People v. Vatansever, 5 A.D.3d 406, 407, 771 N.Y.S.2d 910; cf. People v. Alvarez, 20 N.Y.3d 75, 955 N.Y.S.2d 846, 979 N.E.2d 1173), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

BALKIN, J.P., LOTT, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Miller
(Dec 18, 2013)