Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

STATE of Alabama v. Justin Andrew BAILEY. State of Alabama

JOINER

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court (CC–11–913, CC–11–914); William A. Shashy, J.
Luther Strange, atty. gen., and Michael G. Dean, asst. atty. gen., for appellant. Branch Donelson Kloess, Montgomery, for appellee Justin Andrew Bailey.
Raymond E. Johnson, Montgomery, for appellee Jennifer Leigh Clayton.



On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court


JOINER, Judge.

Natasha Rae Lee and codefendants Justin Andrew Bailey and Jennifer Leigh Clayton filed separate motions to suppress the evidence seized from two separate warrantless searches of their apartment on January 7, 2011, and January 28, 2011, as well as searches of their person on January 28, 2011. The Montgomery Circuit Court granted the motions. The State appealed.

On rehearing, this Court in State v. Lee, 155 So.3d 278 (Ala.Crim.App.2013), affirmed the trial court's order granting the motions to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the January 7 search of the apartment and the January 28 searches of Lee, Bailey, and Clayton. This Court reversed that part of the trial court's order granting the motion to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the January 28 search of the apartment. The Alabama Supreme Court granted the State's petition for certiorari review in case no. CR–11–1866 (Bailey) and case no. CR–11–1867 (Clayton) as to the January 7 search of the apartment and reversed this Court's judgment. State v. Clayton, 155 So.3d 290 (Ala.2014).

The Alabama Supreme Court denied Lee's petition for a writ of certiorari in case no. CR–11–1865.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in Clayton, we reverse that part of the circuit court's order granting the motions to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the January 7 search of the apartment, and remand these cases to the circuit court for proceedings consistent with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in Clayton.

CR–11–1866—REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CR–11–1867—REVERSED AND REMANDED. WINDOM, P.J., and WELCH, KELLUM, and BURKE, JJ., concur. -------- Notes:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Justin Andrew Bailey. State
(Jun 13, 2014)