Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Stormer


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS



This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Elinore Marsh Stormer, of a notice of appeal. On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that respondent shall file any objections to the sanctions issued by the five-judge commission, together with a brief in support thereof, on or before 15 days from the date of this order. It is further ordered that complainant shall file an answer brief on or before 15 days after any brief in support of objections has been filed.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings and further that unless clearly inapplicable, the Rules of Practice shall apply to these proceedings. All documents are subject to Sup.R. 44 through 47, which govern access to court records.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, to respondent's last known address.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Stormer
(Feb 1, 2013)