Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wilson ADAMS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garnett, J.), rendered July 18, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, and failure to signal, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's Batson challenge ( see Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69) to the prosecutor's exercise of a peremptory challenge to exclude a certain black male prospective juror. The Supreme Court's determination that the facially neutral explanation provided by the prosecutor for excluding this prospective juror was not pretextual, which is entitled to great deference on appeal, is supported by the record ( see People v. Hecker, 15 N.Y.3d 625, 656, 663–665, 917 N.Y.S.2d 39, 942 N.E.2d 248;People v. Smith, 98 A.D.3d 533, 534, 949 N.Y.S.2d 190;People v. Waters, 81 A.D.3d 673, 673–674, 916 N.Y.S.2d 791).

MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Adams
(Jun 4, 2014)