AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thomas WASHINGTON, Defendant/Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Margaret M. Neill, Judge.Shaun J. Mackelprang, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent. Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant. Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Washington (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a bench trial finding him guilty of first-degree attempted sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find Appellant guilty of first-degree attempted sodomy beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Johnson, 244 S.W.3d 144, 152 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Washington
(Nov 8, 2011)