Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

STATE of North Carolina v. Malik Shaheem FRANKLIN.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 736 S.E.2d 218 (2012), affirming an order denying defendant's motion to suppress which resulted in a judgment entered on 8 November 2011 by Judge Hugh B. Lewis in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 4 September 2013. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Andrew J. DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.


Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Franklin
(Dec 20, 2013)