Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

STATE of Connecticut v. SAMUEL M.

Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Bryan P. Fiengo, New London, in opposition.

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 159 Conn.App. 242, 123 A.3d 44 (2015), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that in crimes automatically transferred from the juvenile docket of the Superior Court to the regular docket of the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 46b–127 (a)(1), the state bears the burden of establishing the child's eligibility to be tried and sentenced as an adult?

“2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the state must meet its burden with proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

“3. Did the Appellate Court apply the correct standard of review to the trial court's decision denying the defendant's motion to dismiss and transfer the case to the juvenile docket?

“4. If the answer to the third question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the state failed to establish, by any burden of proof, that the defendant was at least fourteen years old at the time he committed the crimes?”

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Samuel M.
(Nov 12, 2015)