AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

REFUGIO NIETO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants.

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE; CONTINUING HEARING TO NOVEMBER 6, 2015, 1:00 P.M.; AND TENTATIVE RULING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 59-62

In their reply in support of summary judgment, Defendants have submitted four additional declarations with evidence they wish this Court to consider. See Dkt. Nos. 59-62. However, "[t]he district court need not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief." Zamani v. Carnes, 491 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir. 2007). Therefore, this Court is not required to consider the four additional declarations. If the Nietos wish to object to these declarations or respond to their merits, they have until November 5, 2015, at noon to do so.

The Court continues the hearing to November 6, 2015, at 1:00 p.m. in San Francisco Courtroom D.

Finally, the Court's tentative ruling on Defendants' motion for summary judgment is to DENY it due to a genuine dispute of material facts. This does not apply to the Nietos' Monell claim, which they have agreed not to pursue.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2015

/s/_________


NATHANAEL M. COUSINS


United States Magistrate Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Nieto v. City of S.F.
(Nov 2, 2015)