Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

Michael Duane ZACK, III, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, Pam Bondi, Respondents–Appellees.

Martin J. McClain (Court–Appointed), Linda McDermott (Court–Appointed), McClain & McDermott, P.A., Wilton Manors, FL, for Petitioner–Appellant. Charmaine M. Millsaps, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents–Appellees.
Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida (No. 05–00369–CV–RH); Robert Hinkle, Judge.
(Opinion Jan. 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265, 11th Cir.2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:





A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Zack v. Tucker
(Apr 30, 2012)