AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrie D. PEMBERTON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), imposed March 21, 2011, which, upon his conviction of sodomy in the first degree, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on August 21, 2001.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952; People v. Ralph, 91 A.D.3d 796, 936 N.Y.S.2d 903; People v. Algarin, 89 A.D.3d 859, 932 N.Y.S.2d 358).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. RIVERA, J.P., ENG, CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Pemberton
(Mar 6, 2012)