Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

MARK DOUGLAS BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DADMA LYDIA DIAZ C; JUDGE LAWRENCE HAMMOND; KRISTY M. NEWTON, DA; CANDACE E. SILER; JUDGE REGINA M. JOE, Defendants - Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA) Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Douglas Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Douglas Brooks appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Diaz C, No. 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Brooks v. Diaz
(Jul 23, 2015)