Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

AMWARD HOMES, INC.; Ange Construction Company; Bluepoint Homes, Inc.; Homescape Building Company; Impact Design–Build, Inc.; John Leggett and Company; Poythress Construction Company, Inc.; Poythress Homes, Inc.; Wardson Construction, Inc.; WHG, INC. d/b/a Timberline Builders; and Zeigler & Company v. TOWN OF CARY, a body politic and corporateTradition at Stonewater I, LP

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–31 from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 698 S.E.2d 404 (2010), affirming orders entered on 5 March 2009, 1 April 2009, and 2 April 2009, all by Judge Carl R. Fox in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 October 2011.

K & L Gates LLP, Research Triangle Park by William J. Brian, Jr. and Keith P. Anthony, for plaintiff-appellees. Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP, Raleigh by Michael T. Henry, Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., and John C. Cooke; and Brough Law Firm, Chapel Hill by Michael B. Brough, for defendant-appellant.

Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, and Gregory F. Schwitzgebel III, Senior Assistant General Counsel, for North Carolina League of Municipalities, amicus curiae.J. Michael Carpenter, General Counsel, North Carolina Home Builders Association, for Raleigh–Wake County Home Builders Association and North Carolina Home Builders Association, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Hall v. Toreros II, Inc., 363 N.C. 114, 678 S.E.2d 656 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Amward Homes Inc. v. Town of Cary
(Nov 10, 2011)