AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MARK GRAVES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID AUSTIN and DANVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants.

Jackson L. Kiser

ORDER
By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser
Senior United States District Judge

Before me are Defendant David Austin's Second Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [ECF No. 22] and Defendant Danville Police Department's ("DPD") Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [ECF No. 24]. Pro se Plaintiff Mark Graves was served with both Motions, as well as a notice pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, but he did not respond. The matter was set for oral argument on November 29, 2012, but Plaintiff did not appear to defend against the Motions. Defendants submitted their respective Motions on the briefs, and the matter is now ripe for decision. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed herewith, I will construe Defendant Austin's Motion under Rule 12(c) as a motion under Rule 12(b)(6), and I hereby GRANT the Motion. I also GRANT Defendant DPD's Motion to Dismiss.

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all parties and counsel of record, and to dismiss this case from the docket of the Court.

Jackson L. Kiser


SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Graves v. Austin
(Dec 3, 2012)