AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis NATAL, Defendant–Appellant.

FRIEDMAN


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Angie Louie of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michelle W. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., CATTERSON, RENWICK, DeGRASSE, ROMÁN, JJ.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered January 21, 2011, convicting defendant, after a bench trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 18 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to 15 years, and otherwise affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). The evidence supported the trier of fact's determination that although intoxicated, defendant had the intent to cause serious physical injury when he stabbed the victim in the chest ( seePenal Law § 15.25). Defendant's oral and videotaped postarrest statements, as well as the observations of the responding police officers, contradicted defendant's claim that he was so intoxicated that he was unable to form the requisite criminal intent ( see generally People v. Sirico, 17 N.Y.3d 744, 746, 929 N.Y.S.2d 14, 952 N.E.2d 1006 [2011] ).

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Natal
(Nov 15, 2012)