AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony HANELY, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and William H. Branigan of counsel; Andrew Dykens on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin Brandt, J.), rendered July 14, 2011, convicting him of assault in the second*871degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his waiver of indictment was valid ( see N.Y. Const., art. I, § 6; CPL 195.10, 195.20; People v. Pierce, 14 N.Y.3d 564, 567–568, 904 N.Y.S.2d 255, 930 N.E.2d 176;People v. Gramola, 102 A.D.3d 810, 810, 957 N.Y.S.2d 893,lv. denied20 N.Y.3d 1099, 965 N.Y.S.2d 795, 988 N.E.2d 533). Therefore, the defendant was properly prosecuted by Superior Court Information.

BALKIN, J.P., HALL, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Hanely
(Jun 19, 2013)