Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
  • For the appellant, Walter D. Van Riper, Attorney-
  • For the respondent, Milton, McNulty Augelli ( Anthony T. Augelli, of counsel).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
  • For the appellant, Walter D. Van Riper, Attorney-
  • For the respondent, Milton, McNulty Augelli ( Anthony T. Augelli, of counsel).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

EDWARD A. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. HOMER C. ZINK, ETC., APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Burling in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

MURPHY v. ZINK
(Jan 29, 1948)